Publications

Nicolas, D. (2016). Interprétons-nous de la même manière les expressions 'deux pommes' et 'deux pommes et demie'? Travaux de Linguistique, 72(1), 107-119. doi:10.3917/tl.072.0107

Jacquet, P., Safra, L., Wyart, V., Baumard, N. & Chevallier, C. (2019). The ecological roots of human susceptibility to social influence: a pre-registered study investigating the impact of early-life adversity. Royal Society Open Science, 6(1), 180454. doi:10.1098/rsos.180454

Abdel Sater, R., Mus, M., Wyart, V. & Chevallier, C. (2023). A zero-cost attention-based approach to promote cleaner streets: A Signal Detection Theory approach in Parisian streets. PloS one, 18(4), e0284272. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0284272

Mari, A. (2016). Actuality entailments: when the modality is in the presupposition. In Amblard M., de Groote P., Pogodalla S., Retoré C. (Eds.), Vol. 10054: In Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. Celebrating 20 Years of LACL (1996–2016), Dordrecht: Springer Verlag, 191-210. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53826-5_12

Mari, A. (2017). Actuality Entailments: When the Modality is in the Presupposition. Lecture notes in Computer Science, 191-210

Lee, J. , Rouault, M. & Wyart, V. (2023). Adaptive tuning of human learning and choice variability to unexpected uncertainty. Science Advances, 9(13). doi:10.1126/sciadv.add0501

Le Bars, S., Devaux, A., Nevidal, T., Chambon, V. & Pacherie, E. (2020). Agents' pivotality and reward fairness modulate sense of agency in cooperative joint action. Cognition, 195, 104117. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104117

Balsdon, T., Schweitzer, R. , Watson, T. & Rolfs, M. (2018). All is not lost: Post-saccadic contributions to the perceptual omission of intra-saccadic streaks. Consciousness and Cognition , 64, 19-31. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.05.004

Nicolas, D. (2006). Ambiguïté. Sémanticlopédie: dictionnaire de sémantique

de Gardelle, V., Kouider, S. & Sackur, J. (2010). An oblique illusion modulated by visibility: non-monotonic sensory integration in orientation processing. Journal of vision, 10(10), 6. doi:10.1167/10.10.6

Martin, J., Sackur, J. & Dienes, Z. (2017). Attention or instruction: Do sustained attentional abilities really differ between high and low hypnotisable persons? Psychological research, 1. doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0850-1

Vandendriessche, C., Bastian, M., Peyre, H., Stordeur, C., Asquaviva, E., Bahadori, S., Delorme, R. & Sackur, J. (2017). Attentional Lapses in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Blank Rather Than Wandering Thoughts. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1375-1386. doi:10.1177/0956797617708234

Chambon, V., Thero, H., Findling, C. & Koechlin, E. (2018). Believing in one's power: a counterfactual heuristic for goal-directed control. bioRxiv, 498675. doi:10.1101/498675

Sackur, J. (2018). Can hypnosis displace the threshold for visual consciousness? Neuroscience of consciousness, 4(1). doi:10.1093/nc/niy009

Chambon, V., Thero, H., Vidal, M., Vandendriessche, C., Haggard, P. & Palminteri, S. (2020). Choosing and learning: outcome valence differentially affects learning from free versus forced choices. Nature Human Behaviour, .

Vuillaume , L., Martin, J., Sackur, J. & Cleeremans, A. (2020). Comparing self- and hetero-metacognition in the absence of verbal communication. Plos One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231530

Laurène, V., Jean-Rémy, M., Sackur, J. & Axel, C. (2019). Comparing self- and hetero-metacognition in the absence of verbal communication. Plos One, 15(4), e0231530. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231530

Nicolas, D. (2006). Compositionalité: questions philosophiques. Sémanticlopédie: dictionnaire de sémantique

Findling, C. & Wyart, V. (2021). Computation noise in human learning and decision-making: origin, impact, function. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 38, 124-132. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.018

Findling, C., Skvortsova , V., Dromnelle, R. , Palminteri, S. & Wyart, V. (2019). Computational noise in reward-guided learning drives behavioral variability in volatile environments. Nature Neuroscience , 22, 2066–2077. doi:10.1101/439885

Mari, A. & Retoré, C. (2016). Conditions d’assertion de "chaque" et de "tout" et règles de déduction du quantificateur universel. Travaux de Linguistique , 72, 89-106. doi:10.3917/tl.072.0089

David, A., Mahiko, K., Sackur, J. & Vincent De, G. (2021). Confidence can be automatically integrated across two visual decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(2), 161-171. doi:10.1037/xhp0000884

Balsdon, T., Wyart, V. & Mamassian, P. (2020). Confidence controls perceptual evidence accumulation. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1753. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15561-w

Dehaene, S., Changeux, J., Naccache, L., Sackur, J. & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends in cognitive sciences, 10(5), 204-11. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007

Rahnev, D., Balsdon, T., Charles, L., de Gardelle, V., Denison, R., Desender, K., Faivre, N., Filevich, E., Fleming, S., Jehee, J., Lau, H., Lee, A., Locke, S., Mamassian, P., Odegaard, B., Peters, M., Reyes, G., Rouault, M., Sackur, J., Samaha, J., Sergent, C., Sherman, M., Siedlecka, M., Soto, D., Vlassova, A. & Zylberberg, A. (2022). Consensus goals for the field of visual metacognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, . doi:10.1177/17456916221075615

Stojanovic, I., De Brabanter, P., Nicolas, D. & Villanueva, N. (2005). Deferential Utterances. In Casati, R. and Origgi, G. (Eds.), In Referring to Objects, Interdisciplines.org., 4-19.

Justo, D., Dutant, J., Hardy-Vallée, B., Nicolas, D. & Sylvand, B. (2003). Delegation, subdivision, and modularity: How rich is Conceptual Structure? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(6), 683-684. doi:10.1017/S0140525X03390156

Corblin, F. & Nicolas, D. (2016). Déterminants et Inférences. Travaux de Linguistique, 72(1), 7-10. doi:10.3917/tl.072.0007

Landry, M., Da Silva Castanheira , J., Sackur, J. & Raz, A. (2021). Difficult Turned Easy: Suggestion Renders a Challenging Visual Task Simple. Psychological Science, 32(1), 39-49. doi:10.1177/0956797620954856

Nicolas, D. (2002). Do mass nouns constitute a semantically uniform class? Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 26, 113-121. doi:10.17161/KWPL.1808.591