Publications

de Vignemont, F. (2021). A Minimal Sense of Here-ness. The Journal of Philosophy, 118(4), 169-187. doi:10.5840/jphil2021118413

de Vignemont, F. (2023). Affective bodily awareness.

de Vignemont, F. (2019). Against phenomenal parsimony: a plea for bodily feelings. In Goldman, Alvin McLaughlin, McLaughlin (Eds.), Metaphysics and cognitive science Oxford: Oxford University Press

de Gardelle, V., Kouider, S. & Sackur, J. (2010). An oblique illusion modulated by visibility: non-monotonic sensory integration in orientation processing. Journal of vision, 10(10), 6. doi:10.1167/10.10.6

Martin, J., Sackur, J. & Dienes, Z. (2017). Attention or instruction: Do sustained attentional abilities really differ between high and low hypnotisable persons? Psychological research, 1. doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0850-1

Vandendriessche, C., Bastian, M., Peyre, H., Stordeur, C., Asquaviva, E., Bahadori, S., Delorme, R. & Sackur, J. (2017). Attentional Lapses in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Blank Rather Than Wandering Thoughts. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1375-1386. doi:10.1177/0956797617708234

de Vignemont, F. (2020). Bodily Awareness. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, .

de Vignemont, F. (2020). Bodily Feelings: Presence, Agency, and Ownership. In Uriah Kriegel (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Consciousness Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198749677.013.4

Alsmith, A. (2019). Bodily structure and body representation. Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02200-1

Sackur, J. (2018). Can hypnosis displace the threshold for visual consciousness? Neuroscience of consciousness, 4(1). doi:10.1093/nc/niy009

Chambon, V., Thero, H., Vidal, M., Vandendriessche, C., Haggard, P. & Palminteri, S. (2020). Choosing and learning: outcome valence differentially affects learning from free versus forced choices. Nature Human Behaviour, .

Apelian, C., de Vignemont, F. & B Terhune, D. (2023). Comparative effects of hypnotic suggestion and imagery instruction on bodily awareness. Consciousness and cognition, 108, 103473. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2023.103473

Vuillaume , L., Martin, J., Sackur, J. & Cleeremans, A. (2020). Comparing self- and hetero-metacognition in the absence of verbal communication. Plos One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231530

Laurène, V., Jean-Rémy, M., Sackur, J. & Axel, C. (2019). Comparing self- and hetero-metacognition in the absence of verbal communication. Plos One, 15(4), e0231530. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231530

David, A., Mahiko, K., Sackur, J. & Vincent De, G. (2021). Confidence can be automatically integrated across two visual decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(2), 161-171. doi:10.1037/xhp0000884

Dehaene, S., Changeux, J., Naccache, L., Sackur, J. & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends in cognitive sciences, 10(5), 204-11. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007

Rahnev, D., Balsdon, T., Charles, L., de Gardelle, V., Denison, R., Desender, K., Faivre, N., Filevich, E., Fleming, S., Jehee, J., Lau, H., Lee, A., Locke, S., Mamassian, P., Odegaard, B., Peters, M., Reyes, G., Rouault, M., Sackur, J., Samaha, J., Sergent, C., Sherman, M., Siedlecka, M., Soto, D., Vlassova, A. & Zylberberg, A. (2022). Consensus goals for the field of visual metacognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, . doi:10.1177/17456916221075615

de Vignemont, F. (2023). Désenchanter le corps.

Landry, M., Da Silva Castanheira , J., Sackur, J. & Raz, A. (2021). Difficult Turned Easy: Suggestion Renders a Challenging Visual Task Simple. Psychological Science, 32(1), 39-49. doi:10.1177/0956797620954856

Kouider, S., Sackur, J. & de Gardelle, V. (2012). Do we still need phenomenal consciousness? Comment on Block. Trends in cognitive sciences, 16(3), 140-1; author reply 141-2. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.003

Gajdos, T., Régner, I., Huguet, P., Hainguerlot, M., Vergnaud , J., Sackur, J. & de Gardelle, V. (2019). Does social context impact metacognition? Evidence from stereotype threat in a visual search task. PLoS ONE, 4 (4), e0215050. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215050

Sackur, J. (2011). Dynamics of visual masking revealed by second-order metacontrast. Journal of vision, 11(4), 10. doi:10.1167/11.4.10

Anlló, H., Katsumi, W., Sackur, J. & de Gardelle, V. (2022). Effects of false statements on visual perception hinge on social suggestibility. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform, 48(8), 889–900. doi:10.1037/xhp0001024

de Vignemont, F. (2023). Expecting pain. , 202, 156. doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04394-x

Battaglini, L., Maniglia, M., Konishi, M., Contemori, G., Coccaro, A. & Casco, C. (2018). Fast random motion biases judgments of visible and occluded motion speed. Vision research, 150, 38-43. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2018.08.001

de Vignemont, F. (2021). Feeling the world as being here. In F. de Vignemont, A. Serino, H.Y. Wong, A. Farnè (Eds.), The world at our fingertips: A multidisciplinary investigation of peripersonal space, Oxford : Oxford University Press

de Vignemont, F. (2021). Fifty Shades of Affective Colouring of Perception. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. doi:10.1080/00048402.2021.1965176

Becchio, J., Sackur, J. & Anlló, H. (2017). French Norms for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A. The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis, 65(2), 241-255. doi:10.1080/00207144.2017.1276369

Pitron, V., Alsmith, A. & de Vignemont, F. (2018). How do the body schema and the body image interact? . Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 352-358. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.08.007

de Vignemont, F. (2007). How Many Representations of the Body? Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 30(2), 204–205