Publications

Nicolas, D. (2002). La distinction entre noms massifs et noms comptables. Leuven: Editions Peeters

Nicolas, D. (2002). La catégorisation des noms communs : massifs et comptables. Catégorisation et Langage (pp. 29-51).

Pacherie, E. (2002). Intention .

Pacherie, E. (2002). Reply to John Campbell on Joint attention and simulation.

Nicolas, D. (2004). The semantics of nouns derived from gradable adjectives. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 8, 197-207.

Nicolas, D. (2005). Types of degrees and types of event structures. Event arguments: foundations and applications (pp. 277-300).

Stojanovic, I., De Brabanter, P., Nicolas, D. & Villanueva, N. (2005). Deferential Utterances. In Casati, R. and Origgi, G. (Eds.), In Referring to Objects, Interdisciplines.org., 4-19.

Pacherie, E. (2005). Perceiving Intentions. (pp. 401-414).

Nicolas, D. (2006). Massif / comptable. Sémanticlopédie: dictionnaire de sémantique

Nicolas, D. (2006). Compositionalité: questions philosophiques. Sémanticlopédie: dictionnaire de sémantique

Nicolas, D. (2006). Ambiguïté. Sémanticlopédie: dictionnaire de sémantique

Pacherie, E. (2006). Towards a Dynamic Theory of Intentions . (pp. 145-167).

Dokic, J. & Pacherie, E. (2006). On the Very Idea of a Frame of Reference . (pp. 259-280).

Nicolas, D. (2007). Mass nouns and plural logic (extended abstract) In Proceedings of the 16th Amsterdam Colloquium, 163-168.

De Brabanter, P., Nicolas, D., Stojanovic, I. & Villanueva Fernandez, N. (2007). Les usages déférentiels. In Bouvier, Alban and Conein, Bernard (Eds.), L'épistémologie sociale. Une théorie sociale de la connaissance (pp. 139-162).Editions de l'EHESS

Pacherie, E. (2007). Is collective intentionality really primitive? (pp. 153-175).

Pacherie, E. (2008). Perception, Emotions and Delusions: Revisiting the Capgras Delusion . (pp. 07-126).

Pacherie, E. (2010). Self-Agency.

Pacherie, E. & Haggard, P. (2010). What Are Intentions? . (pp. 70–84).

Pacherie, E. (2012). The Phenomenology of Joint Action: Self-Agency Vs. Joint-Agency . (pp. 343-389).

Pacherie, E. (2012). Action. (pp. 92–111 ).

Asic, T. & Corblin, F. (2014). Telic definties and their prepositions. French and Serbian. In Aguilar-Guevara, Ana, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts (Eds.), Weak Referentiality (pp. 183-212).Benjamins

Mari, A. (2016). Actuality entailments: when the modality is in the presupposition. In Amblard M., de Groote P., Pogodalla S., Retoré C. (Eds.), Vol. 10054: In Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. Celebrating 20 Years of LACL (1996–2016), Dordrecht: Springer Verlag, 191-210. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53826-5_12

Lussange, J., Belianin, A., Bourgeois-Gironde, S. & Gutkin, B. (2017). A bright future for financial agent-based models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.08222

Giannakidou, A. & Mari, A. (2017). La dimension épistémique du futur : le rôle des adverbes. In Baranzini and de Saussures (Eds.), Le Futur dans les langues RomanesPeter Lang Ag

Bourgeois-Gironde, S. (2017). How regret moves individual and collective choices towards rationality. Handbook of Behavioural Economics and Smart Decision-Making: Rational …

Mari, A. (2018). The French Future : evidentiality and information increase. Evidence for Evidentiality (pp. 199-226). Dordrecht: Benjamins

Nicolas, D. (2018). The logic of mass expressions. In E. N. Zalta (Eds.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab Center for the Study of Language and Information Stanford University

Mari, A. (2018). The French Future : evidentiality and information increase. Evidence for Evidentiality (pp. 199-226). Dordrecht: Benjamins

Bourgeois-Gironde, S. (2019). Comment Managua fut vers 1979 le lieu d’un événement linguistique révolutionnaire. In ESKA (Eds.), Problèmes d'Amérique latine (Vol. 112, pp. 101-114). doi:0.3917/pal.112.0101