Publications

Schlenker, P. (2019). What is Super Semantics? Philosophical perspectives, 32, 365-453. doi:10.1111/phpe.12122

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E. & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). What Do Monkey Calls Mean? Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(12), 894-904. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.004

Strickland, B. & J. Scholl, B. (2015). Visual Perception Involves Event-Type Representations: The Case of Containment Versus Occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 570–580. doi:10.1037/a0037750

Schlenker, P. (2018). Visible Meaning: Sign language and the foundations of semantics. Theoretical Linguistics, 44(3-4), 123-208. doi:10.1515/tl-2018-0012

Aristodemo, V. & Geraci, C. (2017). Visible degrees in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language {&} Linguistic Theory, -(on line). doi:10.1007/s11049-017-9389-5

Geraci, C., Bayley, R., Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C. & Donati, C. (2015). Variation in Italian Sign Language (LIS): The case of wh -signs. Linguistics, 53(1), 125–151. doi:10.1515/ling-2014-0031

Corblin, F. & Asic, T. (2016). Une nouvelle approche de l'opposition ici/là et ovde/tu . Travaux de linguistique , 72(1), 29-48. doi:10.3917/tl.072.0029

Corblin, F. & Vlachou, E. (2016). Une échelle de mesure pour la précision relative des quantifieurs . Travaux de linguistique , 72(1), 49-71. doi:10.3917/tl.072.0049

Schlenker, P. (2021). Triggering Presuppositions. Glossa, 6(1), 35. doi:10.5334/gjgl.1352

Nicolas, D. (2010). Towards a semantics for mass expressions derived from gradable expressions. Recherches Linguistique de Vincennes, 39, 163-198. doi:10.4000/rlv.1857

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Cäsar, C., Zuberbühler, K. & Ryder, R. (2017). Titi semantics: Context and meaning in Titi monkey call sequences. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 35(1), 271-298. doi:10.1007/s11049-016-9337-9

Berthet, M., Mesbahi, G. , Pajot, A. , Cäsar, C., Neumann, C. & Zuberbühler, K. (2019). Titi monkeys combine alarm calls to create probabilistic meaning. Science Advances, 5(5), eaav3991. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav3991

Matushansky, O. & Spector, B. (2004). Tinker, tailor, soldier, spy. In Maier, Emar and Corien Bary and Janneke Huitink (Eds.), In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9, Maier, Emar and Corien Bary and Janneke Huitink, 241–255.

Kuhn, J., Sheng, H. & Schlenker, P. (2021). Timelines and Temporal Pointing in Chinese Sign Language. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 6(1), 133. doi:10.16995/glossa.5836

Schlenker, P., Aristodemo Santoro, V., Ducasse, L. , Lamberton, J. & Santoro, M. (2016). The Unity of Focus: Evidence from Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry, 47(2), 363-381. doi:10.1162/LING_a_00215

Cecchetto, C., Checchetto, A., Geraci, C., Santoro, M. & Zucchi, S. (2015). The syntax of predicate ellipsis in Italian Sign Language (LIS) Lingua, 166, 214–235. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2014.12.011

Mantovan, L. & Geraci, C. (2017). The syntax of nominal modification in Italian Sign Language (LIS) Sign Language and Linguistics, 20(2), 183-220

Wilcox, E. & Spector, B. (2019). The Role of Prior Beliefs in The Rational Speech Act Model of Pragmatics: Exhaustivity as a Case Study. In CogSci, 3099-3105.

Anvari, A., Maldonado, M. & Soria Ruiz, A. (2019). The Puzzle of Reflexive Belief Construction in Spanish. In Espinal, M. T.; Castroviejo, E.; Leonetti, M.; McNally, L.; and Real-Puigdollers, C. (Eds.), In Proceedings of the 23rd Sinn und Bedeutung Conference, 57–74.

Bai, D. & Strickland, B. (2023). The Pulfrich solidity illusion: a surprising demonstration of the visual system’s tolerance of solidity violations. Psychon Bull Rev. doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02271-9

Schlenker, P. (2011). The Proviso Problem: A Note. Natural Language Semantics, 19(4), 395–422 . doi:10.1007/s11050-011-9072-z

Spector, B. (2017). The pragmatics of plural predication: Homogeneity and Non-Maximality within the Rational Speech Act Model. In Cremers, Alexandre and Thom van Gessel and Floris Roelofsen (Eds.), In Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium, 435–444.

Dezecache, G., Grèzes, J. & Dahl, C. (2017). The nature and distribution of affiliative behaviour during exposure to mild threat. Royal Society open science, 4(8), 170265. doi:10.1098/rsos.170265

Checchetto, A., Geraci, C., Cecchetto, C. & Zucchi, S. (2018). The language instinct in extreme circumstances: The transition to tactile Italian Sign Language ( LISt ) by Deafblind signers. Glossa, 3(1)

Fisher, M., Knobe, J., Strickland, B. & Keil, F. (2017). The Influence of Social Interaction on Intuitions of Objectivity and Subjectivity. Cognitive science, 41(4), 1119-1134. doi:10.1111/cogs.12380

Kuhn, J. (2021). The dynamics of negative concord. Linguist and Philos. doi:10.1007/s10988-020-09318-3

Marie, A. , Yesilaltay , S. & Strickland, B. (2020). The cognitive foundations of misinformation on science - What we know and what scientists can do about it. EMBO Rep , 21(4), e50205. doi:10.15252/embr.202050205

Strickland, B., Aristodemo, V., Kuhn, J. & Geraci, C. (2017). The categorical role of structurally iconic signs. The Behavioral and brain sciences, 40, e72. doi:10.1017/S0140525X15003076

Bai, D., Falck, A. & Strickland, B. (2021). The adult visual system resists learning continuity violations. Journal of vision, 21, 2590. doi:10.1167/jov.21.9.2590

Schlenker, P., Coye, C. , Leroux, M. & Chemla, E. (2023). The ABC-D of animal linguistics: are syntax and compositionality for real? Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 98(4), 1142-1159. doi:10.1111/brv.12944