Publications

de Vignemont, F. (2023). Expecting pain. , 202, 156. doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04394-x

de Vignemont, F., Wong, H. , Serino, A. & Farnè, A. (2023). The world at our fingertips: a multidisciplinary investigation of Peripersonal space. . doi:10.1093/oso/9780198851738.001.0001

de Vignemont, F. (2023). Désenchanter le corps.

de Vignemont, F. (2023). Affective bodily awareness.

Apelian, C., de Vignemont, F. & B Terhune, D. (2023). Comparative effects of hypnotic suggestion and imagery instruction on bodily awareness. Consciousness and cognition, 108, 103473. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2023.103473

Apelian, C., B Terhune, D. & de Vignemont, F. (2023). Hypnotic suggestion versus sensory modulation of bodily awareness. PloS one, 18(9), e0291493. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0291493

Proust, J. (2022). The Cultural Evolution of Information Seeking. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 25(5), 467-484. doi:10.1163/15685373-12340146

Branch-Smith, T. & Origgi, G. (2022). Social Indicators of Trust in the Age of Informational Chaos. Social Epistemology, 36(5), 533-540. doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2121622

Origgi, G. (2022). The Social Indicators of the Reputation of an Expert. Social Epistemology, 36(5), 541–549. doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2116962

Recanati, F. (2022). Understanding Force Cancellation. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy , . doi:10.1080/0020174X.2022.2075920

Kim, S., Senju, A., Sodian, B., Paulus, M., Itakura, S., Okuno , A., Ueno, M. & Proust, J. (2021). Memory Monitoring and Control in Japanese and German Preschoolers. Memory & Cognition. doi:10.3758/s13421-021-01263-1

Origgi, G., Branch-Smith, T. & Morisseau, T. (2021). Trust, expertise and the controversy over chloroquine. Social Epistemology A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy

Marchand, S., Origgi, G. & Chouchan, N. (2021). Entretien avec G. Origgi : La post-vérité. Cahiers philosophiques, 164(1), 123-131. doi:10.3917/caph1.164.0125

Origgi, G. (2022). Populismo epistemico o della tirannia del buon senso. Teoria politica, 11, 113-122

Branch-Smith, T. , Origgi, G. & Morisseau, T. (2022). Why Trust Raoult? How Social Indicators Inform the Reputations of Experts. Social Epistemology, 36(3), 299-316 . doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2042421

Cepollaro, B. & Stojanovic, I. (2016). Hybrid Evaluatives: In Defense of a Presuppositional Account . Grazer Philosophische Studien, 93(3), 458–488

Stojanovic, I. (2016). Expressing Aesthetic Judgments in Context1. Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 59(6), 663–685

Stojanovic, I. & Villanueva Fernandez, N. (2015). Mental Files, Blown Up by Indexed Files. Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy, 58 (4), 393–407

Stojanovic, I. (2012). On Value-Attributions: Semantics and Beyond . Southern Journal of Philosophy, 50(4), 621–638

Stojanovic, I. (2012). The Problem of De Se Assertion . Erkenntnis, 76(1), 49–58

Stojanovic, I. (2012). Domain-Sensitivity . Synthese, 184(2), 137–155

Stojanovic, I. (2010). Context, Meaning and Logical Truth. Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research. Special Issue on Logic and Philosophy Today, 2(27), 13-26

Stojanovic, I. (2009). When Truth Gives Out, by Mark Richard . Disputatio, 27, 150-158

Stojanovic, I. (2009). Semantic Content. Manuscrito, 32 (1), 123–152

Stojanovic, I. (2008). The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction . Synthese, 165(3), 317–319

Stojanovic, I. (2007). Talking about Taste: Disagreement, Implicit Arguments and Relative Truth. Linguistics and Philosophy, 30, 691-706. doi:10.1007/s10988-008-9030-5

Stojanovic, I. (2017). Context and Disagreement. Cadernos de Estudos Linguisticos, 59, 7-22. doi:10.20396/cel.v59i1.8648515

Stojanovic, I. (2014). Brevity. Journal of Linguistics, 50(3), 743-4

Stojanovic, I. (2008). I investigate the relationship among the notions of meaning, content, and what is said. It is widely held that indexicals – words like 'this', 'I', or 'today' – contribute their reference, and nothing but their reference, to the semantic content, and ther. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller

Proust, J. (2023). Affordances from a control viewpoint. Philosophical Psychology . doi:10.1080/09515089.2023.2274489