Publications

Melnik, G. & Peperkamp, S. (2019). Perceptual deletion and asymmetric lexical access in second language learners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145, EL13-EL18. doi:10.1121/1.5085648

Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E. & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress 'deafness': the case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106(2), 682-706. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.001

Marty, P., Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2015). Phantom readings: the case of modified numerals. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(4), 462-477. doi:10.1080/23273798.2014.931592

Remme, M., Lengyel, M. & Gutkin, B. (2014). Phase Response Methods in Dendritic Dynamics. In Schultheiss et al (eds) (Eds.), Phase Response Cruves in NeuroscienceSpringer

Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Pena, M., Christophe, A. & Landrieu, P. (2004). Phoneme perception in a neonate with a left sylvian infarct. Brain and Language, 88(1), 26-38. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00284-0

Martin, A. & Peperkamp, S. (2020). Phonetically natural rules benefit from a learning bias: a re-examination of vowel harmony and disharmony. Phonology, 37, 65-90. doi:10.1017/S0952675720000044

Peperkamp, S. (2003). Phonological acquisition: recent attainments and new challenges. Language and speech, 46(Pt 2-3), 87-113. doi:10.1177/00238309030460020401

Christophe, A., Peperkamp, S., Pallier, C., Block, E. & Mehler, J. (2004). Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access I. Adult data. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(4), 523-547. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.001

Gout, A., Christophe, A. & Morgan, J. (2004). Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access II. Infant data. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(4), 548-567. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2004.07.002

Millotte, S., René, A., Wales, R. & Christophe, A. (2008). Phonological phrase boundaries constrain the online syntactic analysis of spoken sentences. Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 34(4), 874-85. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.874

de Carvalho, A., Dautriche, I., Lin, I. & Christophe, A. (2017). Phrasal prosody constrains syntactic analysis in toddlers. Cognition, 163, 67-79. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.018

Millotte, S., Morgan, J., Margules, S., Bernal, S., Dutat, M. & Christophe, A. (2010). Phrasal prosody constrains word segmentation in French 16-month-olds. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 9, 67-86

Millotte, S., Wales, R. & Christophe, A. (2007). Phrasal prosody disambiguates syntax. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(6), 898-909. doi:10.1080/01690960701205286

Parlato-Oliveira, E., Christophe, A., Hirose, Y. & Dupoux, E. (2010). Plasticity of illusory vowel perception in Brazilian-Japanese bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127(6), 3738-3748. doi:10.1121/1.3327792

Origgi, G. (2018). Politicamente corretto. Genesi, sviluppi e derive di un’ideologia Americana. Micromega

Origgi, G. (2022). Populismo epistemico o della tirannia del buon senso. Teoria politica, 11, 113-122

Proust, J. (2008). Précis de La Nature de la Volonté. Philosophiques , 35(1), 109

Proust, J. (2008). Précis de La Nature de la Volonté Et Disputatio . Philosophiques, 0–00

Proust, J. (2014). Précis of The Philosophy of Metacognition. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 89(3), 703–709. doi:10.1111/phpr.12152

Guevara Rukoz, A., Parlato-Oliveira, E., Yu, S., Hirose, Y., Peperkamp, S. & Dupoux, E. (2017). Predicting epenthetic vowel quality from acoustics. In INTERSPEECH-2017, 596-600.

Chemla, E., Egré, P. & Schlenker, P. (2015). Predicting Moral Judgments From Causal Judgments . Philosophical Psychology, 28(1), 21–48. doi:10.1080/09515089.2013.863145

Koechlin, E. (2018). Prefrontal function and cognitive control: from action to language. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 21, 106-111. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.03.008

Rouault, M., Drugowitsch, J. & Koechlin, E. (2019). Prefrontal mechanisms combining rewards and beliefs in human decision-making. Nature Communications, 10, 301. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08121-w

de Carvalho, A., Dautriche, I. & Christophe, A. (2016). Preschoolers use phrasal prosody online to constrain syntactic analysis. Developmental science, 19(2), 235-50. doi:10.1111/desc.12300

Babineau, M. & Christophe, A. (2022). Preverbal infants' sensitivity to grammatical dependencies. . doi:10.1111/infa.12466

Maldonado, M., Spector, B. & Chemla, E. (2017). Priming methods in semantics and pragmatics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40. doi:10.1017/S0140525X17000516

Maldonado, M., Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2017). Priming plural ambiguities. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 89-101. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2017.02.002

Havron, N., Scaff, C., Carbajal, J., Linzen, T., Barrault, A. & Christophe, A. (2021). Priming syntactic ambiguity resolution in children and adults. Language Cognition and Neuroscience, 35, 1445, 1445-1455. doi:10.1080/23273798.2020.1797130

Cremers, A. & Chemla, E. (2017). Probability Judgments of Gappy Sentences. In Pistoia-Reda, Salvatore and Filippo Domaneschi (Eds.), Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Approaches on Implicatures and Presuppositions (pp. 111-150).Palgrave

Bernard, S., Proust, J. & Clément, F. (2015). Procedural Metacognition and False Belief Understanding in 3- to 5-Year-Old Children. PloS one, 10(10), e0141321. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141321