Publications

Recanati, F. (2017). Cognitive Dynamics: A New Look at an Old Problem. In M. de Ponte et K. Korta (Eds.), Reference and Representation in Thought and Language Oxford: Oxford University Press

Terrone, E. (2017). “TheCinematic Relation: Singular Thought, Mental Files, and Film. In Lars C. Grabbe, Patrick Rupert-Kruse, Norbert M. Schmitz (Eds.), Bildverstehen. Spielarten und Ausprägungen der Verarbeitung multimodaler Bildmedien (pp. 16-30). Darmstadt: Büchner-Verlag

Skvortsova , V., Palminteri, S., Buot, A., Karachi, C., Welter, M., Grabli, D. & Pessiglione, M. (2020). A Causal Role for the Pedunculopontine Nucleus in Human Instrumental Learning. Current Biology, 31(5). doi:10.1016/j.cub.2020.11.042

Lunven, M., Hernandez Dominguez, K., Youssov, K., Hamet Bagnou, J., Fliss, R. , Vandendriessche, H., Bapst, B. , Morgado, G., Remy, P., Schubert, R. , Reilmann, R., Busse, M., Craufurd, D., Massart, R., Rosser, A. & Bachoud-Levi, A. (2023). A new approach to digitized cognitive monitoring: validity of the SelfCog in Huntington's disease. Brain communications, 5(2), fcad043. doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcad043

Nair, A. , B. Johnson, E. , Gregory, S. , Osborne-Crowley, K. , Zeun, P. , Scahill, R. , Lowe, J. , Papoutsi, M., Palminteri, S., Rutledge, R. , Rees, G. & Tabrizi, S. (2021). Aberrant Striatal Value Representation in Huntington's Disease Gene Carriers 25 Years Before Onset. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 6(9), 910-918. doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2020.12.015

Recanati, F. (2017). About the lekton. Response to Max Kölbel. In I. Depraetere et R. Salkie (Eds.), Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line (pp. 215-224). Berlin: Springer

Stojanovic, I. (2017). Aesthetic Adjectives. In Louise McNally, in Young, James (Eds.), The Semantics of Aesthetic Judgment (pp. 17-37).Oxford: Oxford University Press

Lebreton, M., Bavard, S., Daunizeau, J. & Palminteri, S. (2019). Assessing inter-individual differences with task-related functional neuroimaging. Nature Human Behaviour. doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0681-8

Terrone, E. (2017). Be Like This. Norms, Examples, Documents and Indexicals from a Neo-Aristotelian Perspective. Law and Literature, 1-15. doi:10.1080/1535685X.2017.1379194

Lefebvre, G., Lebreton, M., Meyniel, F., Bourgeois-Gironde, S. & Palminteri, S. (2017). Behavioural and neural characterization of optimistic reinforcement learning. Nature Human Behaviour , 1(4), 0067

Terrone, E. (2017). Blessed Are the Forgetful: Utilitarianism and Remarriage in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. Film and Philosophy, 21, 74-89

Stojanovic, I. (2014). Brevity. Journal of Linguistics, 50(3), 743-4

Palminteri, S. & Chevallier, C. (2018). Can We Infer Inter-Individual Differences in Risk-Taking From Behavioral Tasks? Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2307. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02307

Terrone, E. (2017). Character, Spectator, Film: On Cinema as a Plotinian Hierarchy. In Thorsten Botz-Bornstein e Giannis Stamatellos (Eds.), Plotinus and the Moving Image: Neoplatonism and Film Theory (pp. 144-177). Leiden: Brill/Rodopi. doi:10.1163/9789004357167_010

Terrone, E. & Ferraris , M. (2017). Che c’è di nuovo nel realismo? Filosofia e cinema alla riscoperta della realtà. In G. Carluccio, E. Morreale, M. Pierini (Eds.), Intorno al neorealismo. Voci, contesti, linguaggi e culture dell’italia del dopoguerra (pp. 67-72).Scalpendi

Palminteri, S. (2023). Choice-confirmation bias and gradual perseveration in human reinforcement learning. Behavioral neuroscience, 137(1), 78-88. doi:10.1037/bne0000541

Chambon, V., Thero, H., Vidal, M., Vandendriessche, C., Haggard, P. & Palminteri, S. (2020). Choosing and learning: outcome valence differentially affects learning from free versus forced choices. Nature Human Behaviour, .

Findling, C., Skvortsova , V., Dromnelle, R. , Palminteri, S. & Wyart, V. (2019). Computational noise in reward-guided learning drives behavioral variability in volatile environments. Nature Neuroscience , 22, 2066–2077. doi:10.1101/439885

Egré, P. & O’{}madagain, C. (2019). Concept Utility. Journal of Philosophy, 116(10), 525–554. doi:10.5840/jphil20191161034

Palminteri, S., Lefebvre, G., Kilford, E. & Blakemore, S. (2017). Confirmation bias in human reinforcement learning: Evidence from counterfactual feedback processing. PLoS computational biology, 13(8), e1005684. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005684

Chierchia, G. , Soukupová, M., Kilford, E., Griffin, C. , Leung, J. , Palminteri, S. & Blakemore, S. (2022). Confirmatory reinforcement learning changes with age during adolescence. Developmental Science, .(e13330). doi:10.1111/desc.13330

Stojanovic, I. (2017). Context and Disagreement. Cadernos de Estudos Linguisticos, 59, 7-22. doi:10.20396/cel.v59i1.8648515

Palminteri, S. & Maël, L. (2021). Context-dependent outcome encoding in human reinforcement learning. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 41, 144-151. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.06.006

Stojanovic, I. (2010). Context, Meaning and Logical Truth. Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research. Special Issue on Logic and Philosophy Today, 2(27), 13-26

Stojanovic, I. (2011). Context, Meaning and Logical Truth. In Gupta, A. and van Benthem, J. (Eds.), Logic and Philosophy Today (Vol. 30, pp. 11-24). London: College Publications, Studies in Logic Series

Vandendriessche, H., Demmou, A. , Bavard, S., Yadak, J. , Lemogne, C. , Mauras, T. & Palminteri, S. (2022). Contextual influence of reinforcement learning performance of depression: evidence for a negativity bias? Psychological Medicine, ., 1-11. doi:10.1017/S0033291722001593

Lebreton, M., Bacily , K., Palminteri, S. & Engelmann, J. (2019). Contextual influence on confidence judgments in human reinforcement learning. PLoS Comput Biol, 15(4), e1006973. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006973

Recanati, F. (2017). Contextualism and Polysemy. Dialectica, 71(3), 379–397. doi:10.1111/1746-8361.12179

Recanati, F. (2017). Contextualism and Polysemy . Dialectica, 71(3), 379–397

Recanati, F. (2018). Contextualism and Singular Reference. In J. Collins et T. Dobler (Eds.), The Philosophy of Charles Travis: Language, Thought, and Perception (pp. 181-196). Oxford : Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198783916.003.0009