Publications

Strickland, B. & Mercier, H. (2014). Bias neglect: a blind spot in the evaluation of scientific results. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 67(3), 570-80. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.821510

Kuhn, J., Geraci, C., Schlenker, P. & Strickland, B. (2021). Boundaries in Space and Time: Iconic Biases Across Modalities . Cognition, 210, 104596. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104596

Berthet, M., Benjumea, J., Millet, J., Cäsar, C., Zuberbühler, K. & Dunbar, E. (2020). Can emotional communication be semantically rich? The case of titi monkeys. In “An integrative approach to the study of language evolution: Re-drawing the boundaries of language”. Workshop at the Evolang XIII, Brussels, Belgium.

Kominsky, J., Strickland, B., Wertz, A., Elsner, C., Wynn, K. & Keil, F. (2017). Categories and Constraints in Causal Perception. Psychological science, 28(11), 1649-1662. doi:10.1177/0956797617719930

Kominsky, J. , Baker, L. , Keil Frank, C. & Strickland, B. (2021). Causality and continuity close the gaps in event representations. Memory and Cognition, 49, 518-531. doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01102-9

Versteegh, M., Kuhn, J., Synnaeve, G., Ravaux, L., Chemla, E., Cäsar, C., Fuller, J., Murphy, D., Schel, A. & Dunbar, E. (2016). Classification and automatic transcription of primate calls. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(1), EL26. doi:10.1121/1.4954887

Schlenker, P. (2003). Clausal Equations (A Note on the Connectivity Problem) Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 157-214. doi:10.1023/A:1021843427276

Tieu, L., Pasternak , R., Schlenker, P. & Chemla, E. (2018). Co-speech gesture projection: Evidence from inferential judgments. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics , 3(1), 109. doi:10.5334/gjgl.580

Tieu, L., Pasternak , R., Schlenker, P. & Chemla, E. (2017). Co-speech gesture projection: Evidence from truth-value judgment and picture selection tasks. Glossa, 2, 102. doi:10.5334/gjgl.334

Commier, S. & Berthet, M. (2019). Commentary: Titi Semantics: Context and Meaning in Titi Monkey Call Sequences . Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 512. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00512

Grèzes, J. & Dezecache, G. (2012). Communication émotionnelle: mécanismes cognitifs et cérébraux. In P. Allain, G. Aubin & D. Le Gal (Eds.), Cognition Sociale et NeuropsychologieSolal

Spector, B. (2016). Comparing exhaustivity operators. Semantics and Pragmatics, 9(11). doi:10.3765/sp.9.11

Schlenker, P. (2012). Complement Set Anaphora and Structural Iconicity in ASL. Snippets(25), 15-17

Nicolas, D. (2006). Compositionalité: questions philosophiques. Sémanticlopédie: dictionnaire de sémantique

Schlenker, P. (2002). Conditionals as Definite Descriptions (A Referential Analysis) Journal of Language & Computation, 2(3), 417-462. doi:10.1007/s11168-004-0908-2

Mari, A. & Retoré, C. (2016). Conditions d’assertion de "chaque" et de "tout" et règles de déduction du quantificateur universel. Travaux de Linguistique , 72, 89-106. doi:10.3917/tl.072.0089

Schlenker, P. (2004). Context of Thought and Context of Utterance (A Note on Free Indirect Discourse and the Historical Present) Mind & Language, 19(3), 279-304. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00259.x

Falck, A., Labouret, G., Izard, V., Wertz, A., Keil Frank, C. & Strickland, B. (2020). Core cognition in adult vision: A surprising discrepancy between the principles of object continuity and solidity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(12), 2250–2263. doi:10.1037/xge0000785

Strickland, B. & Chemla, E. (2018). Cross-linguistic regularities and learner biases reflect "core" mechanics. PloS one, 13(1), e0184132. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184132

Stojanovic, I., De Brabanter, P., Nicolas, D. & Villanueva, N. (2005). Deferential Utterances. In Casati, R. and Origgi, G. (Eds.), In Referring to Objects, Interdisciplines.org., 4-19.

Justo, D., Dutant, J., Hardy-Vallée, B., Nicolas, D. & Sylvand, B. (2003). Delegation, subdivision, and modularity: How rich is Conceptual Structure? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(6), 683-684. doi:10.1017/S0140525X03390156

Kuhn, J. (2017). Dependent Indefinites: The View From Sign Language. Journal of Semantics , 34(3), 407–446. doi:10.1093/jos/ffx007

Corblin, F. & Nicolas, D. (2016). Déterminants et Inférences. Travaux de Linguistique, 72(1), 7-10. doi:10.3917/tl.072.0007

Geraci, C. & Quer, J. (2014). Determining argument structure in sign languages. , 45–60John Benjamins Publishing Company

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Arnold, K., Lemasson, A., Ouattara, K., Keenan, S., Stephan, C., Ryder, R. & Zuberbühler, K. (2013). Dialectal variation in the meanings of Campbell’s monkey alarm calls. In XIXth International Congress of Linguists (ICL19)-Workshop" Language variation at the interface of psycholinguistics and sociolinguistics".

Kuhn, J. (2021). Discourse anaphora – theoretical and experimental perspectives. In Quer, Pfau, and Herrmann (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Theoretical and Experimental Sign Language Research (pp. 458-479).Routledge

Dieuleveut, A., Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2019 ). Distinctions between primary and secondary scalar implicatures. Journal of Memory and Language, 106, 150-171. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2019.02.008

Spector, B. (2004). Distributivity and specific indefinites. In Sylvia Blaho, Luis Vicente and Mark de Vos (Eds.), In Proceedings of ConSOLE XII, Sylvia Blaho, Luis Vicente and Mark de Vos.

Nicolas, D. (2002). Do mass nouns constitute a semantically uniform class? Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 26, 113-121. doi:10.17161/KWPL.1808.591

Schlenker, P. (2010). Donkey Anaphora in Sign Language I: E-Type vs. Dynamic Accounts. In Maria Aloni, Harald Bastiaanse, Tikitu de Jager, and Katrin Schulz (Eds.), In Logic, Language and Meaning: 17th Amsterdam Colloquium. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_41