Publications

Schlenker, P. (2019). What is Super Semantics? Philosophical perspectives, 32, 365-453. doi:10.1111/phpe.12122

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E. & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). What Do Monkey Calls Mean? Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(12), 894-904. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.004

Strickland, B. & J. Scholl, B. (2015). Visual Perception Involves Event-Type Representations: The Case of Containment Versus Occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 570–580. doi:10.1037/a0037750

Schlenker, P. (2018). Visible Meaning: Sign language and the foundations of semantics. Theoretical Linguistics, 44(3-4), 123-208. doi:10.1515/tl-2018-0012

Aristodemo, V. & Geraci, C. (2017). Visible degrees in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language {&} Linguistic Theory, -(on line). doi:10.1007/s11049-017-9389-5

Geraci, C., Bayley, R., Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C. & Donati, C. (2015). Variation in Italian Sign Language (LIS): The case of wh -signs. Linguistics, 53(1), 125–151. doi:10.1515/ling-2014-0031

Ruys, E. & Spector, B. (2017). Unexpected Wide-Scope Phenomena. In Everaert, Martin and Henk C. Van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Companion to SyntaxWiley. doi:10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom089

Schlenker, P. (2021). Triggering Presuppositions. Glossa, 6(1), 35. doi:10.5334/gjgl.1352

Schlenker, P. (2007). Transparency: An Incremental Theory of Presupposition Projection. In U. Sauerland and P. Stateva (Eds.), Presuppositions and Implicatures in Compositional Semantics (pp. 214-242).

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Arnold, K., Lemasson, A., Ouattara, K., Keenan, S., Stephan, C., Ryder, R. & Zuberbühler, K. (2013). Towards a formal analysis of primate alarm calls. In 23rd Semantics and Linguistics Theory Conference.

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Cäsar, C., Zuberbühler, K. & Ryder, R. (2017). Titi semantics: Context and meaning in Titi monkey call sequences. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 35(1), 271-298. doi:10.1007/s11049-016-9337-9

Berthet, M., Mesbahi, G. , Pajot, A. , Cäsar, C., Neumann, C. & Zuberbühler, K. (2019). Titi monkeys combine alarm calls to create probabilistic meaning. Science Advances, 5(5), eaav3991. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav3991

Kuhn, J., Sheng, H. & Schlenker, P. (2021). Timelines and Temporal Pointing in Chinese Sign Language. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, 6(1), 133. doi:10.16995/glossa.5836

Schlenker, P., Aristodemo Santoro, V., Ducasse, L. , Lamberton, J. & Santoro, M. (2016). The Unity of Focus: Evidence from Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry, 47(2), 363-381. doi:10.1162/LING_a_00215

Cecchetto, C., Checchetto, A., Geraci, C., Santoro, M. & Zucchi, S. (2015). The syntax of predicate ellipsis in Italian Sign Language (LIS) Lingua, 166, 214–235. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2014.12.011

Mantovan, L. & Geraci, C. (2017). The syntax of nominal modification in Italian Sign Language (LIS) Sign Language and Linguistics, 20(2), 183-220

Ripley, D., Verheyen, S. & Egré, P. (2019). The Sorites Paradox in Psychology. In S. Oms and E. Zardini (Eds.), The Sorites Paradox (pp. 263-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Schlenker, P. (2016). The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface. In Aloni, Maria and Dekker, Paul (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics (pp. 664-727). doi:10.1017/CBO9781139236157.023

Bai, D. & Strickland, B. (2023). The Pulfrich solidity illusion: a surprising demonstration of the visual system’s tolerance of solidity violations. Psychon Bull Rev. doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02271-9

Schlenker, P. (2011). The Proviso Problem: A Note. Natural Language Semantics, 19(4), 395–422 . doi:10.1007/s11050-011-9072-z

Schlenker, P. (2014). The Property Paradox in (not so) Plain English. Approaches to Meaning. Composition, Values, and Interpretation (pp. 203-219).

Lochy, A., Rossion , B. & de Heering, A. (2019). The non-linear development of the right hemispheric specialization for human face perception. Neuropsychologia., 126, 10-19. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.029.

Dezecache, G., Grèzes, J. & Dahl, C. (2017). The nature and distribution of affiliative behaviour during exposure to mild threat. Royal Society open science, 4(8), 170265. doi:10.1098/rsos.170265

Schlenker, P. (2005). The Lazy Frenchman's Approach to the Subjunctive. In T. Geerts, I. van Ginneken and H. Jacobs (Eds.), In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2003 Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ , 269-309.

Checchetto, A., Geraci, C., Cecchetto, C. & Zucchi, S. (2018). The language instinct in extreme circumstances: The transition to tactile Italian Sign Language ( LISt ) by Deafblind signers. Glossa, 3(1)

Fisher, M., Knobe, J., Strickland, B. & Keil, F. (2017). The Influence of Social Interaction on Intuitions of Objectivity and Subjectivity. Cognitive science, 41(4), 1119-1134. doi:10.1111/cogs.12380

Kuhn, J. (2021). The dynamics of negative concord. Linguist and Philos. doi:10.1007/s10988-020-09318-3

Marie, A. , Yesilaltay , S. & Strickland, B. (2020). The cognitive foundations of misinformation on science - What we know and what scientists can do about it. EMBO Rep , 21(4), e50205. doi:10.15252/embr.202050205

Strickland, B., Aristodemo, V., Kuhn, J. & Geraci, C. (2017). The categorical role of structurally iconic signs. The Behavioral and brain sciences, 40, e72. doi:10.1017/S0140525X15003076

Bai, D., Falck, A. & Strickland, B. (2021). The adult visual system resists learning continuity violations. Journal of vision, 21, 2590. doi:10.1167/jov.21.9.2590