Publications

Branchini, C., Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C., Donati, C. & Geraci, C. (2015). WH-duplication in Italian Sign Language (LIS) , 39–70John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/bct.71.03bra

Chevallier, C. (2021). Vivre dans un environnement risqué : quels impacts pour la psychologie ? In Claudia Senik (Eds.), Sociétés en danger (Odile Jacob ed., pp. 197 à 208). Paris: La Découverte. doi:10.3917/dec.senik.2021.01.0197

Chevallier, C. (2019). Theory of mind and autism: Revisiting Baron-Cohen et al.’s Sally-Anne study. In A. Slater and P. Quinn (Eds.), Developmental Psychology: Revisiting the Classic Studies 2nd edition (pp. 148-163).Sage

Spector, B. (2017). The pragmatics of plural predication: Homogeneity and Non-Maximality within the Rational Speech Act Model. In Cremers, Alexandre and Thom van Gessel and Floris Roelofsen (Eds.), In Proceedings of the 21st Amsterdam Colloquium, 435–444.

Zuberbühler, K., Chemla, E. & Schlenker, P. (2021). Stereotyped vocalizations. Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science (pp. 7970-7974).Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3330-1

Geraci, C. (2014). Spatial syntax in your hands. , 1, 123–134

Donati, C., Barberà, G., Branchini, C., Cecchetto, C., Geraci, C. & Quer, J. (2017). Searching for imperatives in European sign languages. In Daniël Van}, Olmen and Heinold, Simone (Eds.), Imperatives and Directive Strategies (pp. 111–155).John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/slcs.184.04don

Battaglino, C., Geraci, C., Lombardo, V. & Mazzei, A. (2015). Prototyping and Preliminary Evaluation of Sign Language Translation System in the Railway Domain. , 339–350Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20681-3

Cremers, A. & Chemla, E. (2017). Probability Judgments of Gappy Sentences. In Pistoia-Reda, Salvatore and Filippo Domaneschi (Eds.), Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Approaches on Implicatures and Presuppositions (pp. 111-150).Palgrave

Geraci, C. & Cecchetto, C. (2013). Negleted cases of rightward movement. , 211–241John Benjamins Publishing Company

Ecoffet, P., Andre, J. & Bredeche, N. (2020). Learning to Cooperate in a Socially Optimal Way in Swarm Robotics. In ALIFE 2020: The 2020 Conference on Artificial Life, 251-259. doi:10.1162/isal_a_00315

Geraci, C. (2015). Italian Sign Language. , 473–510De Gruyter Mouton

Koralus, P. & Mascarenhas, S. (2018). Illusory Inferences in a question-based theory of reasoning. In Turner, Ken and Horn, Laurence (Eds.), Pragmatics, Truth, and Underspecification: Towards an Atlas of Meaning (pp. 300–322). Leiden: Brill

Langlais, P. , Camps, J. , Baumard, N. & Morin, O. (2022). From Roland to Conan: First results on the corpus of French literary fictions (1050-1920) In Digital Humanities 2022 (DH2022), Tokyo, Japan.

Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2010 ). Experimental Detection of Embedded Implicatures. In Aloni, Maria and Bastiaanse, Harald and de Jager, Tikitu and Schulz, Katrin (Eds.), In Logic, Language and Meaning: 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 53–62. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_6

Dubourg, E. & Baumard, N. (2023). Do Fictions Impact People's Beliefs? A Critical View. The Routledge Handbook of Fiction and Belief (Routledge ed., pp. 18).

Geraci, C. & Quer, J. (2014). Determining argument structure in sign languages. , 45–60John Benjamins Publishing Company

Baumard, N. & Cova, F. (2018). De la coopération à la culture. In Andler, Collins, Tallon-Baudry (Eds.), La cognition. Du neurone à la société (pp. 563-597). Paris: Gallimard

Mercier, H. & Sperber, D. (2020). Bounded reason in a social world. In Ricardo Viale (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Bounded Rationality

Abrusan, M. & Spector, B. (2008). An Interval-Based Semantics for Degree Questions: Negative Islands and Their Obviation. In Abner, Natasha and Jason Bishop (Eds.), In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Cascadilla Proceedings Project, 17-26.

Geraci, C. & Aristodemo, V. (2016). An in-depth tour into sentential complementation in Italian Sign Language. , 95–150

Mercier, H. (2019 in press). A paradox of information aggregation: We do it well but think about it poorly, and why this is a problem for institutions. In Ballantyne, N. & Dunning, D. (Eds.), Reason, Bias, and Inquiry: New Perspectives from the Crossroads of Epistemology and PsychologyOxford University Press