Publications

Lenglin, V., Wong, S. , O'Callaghan, C. , Erzinçlioǧlu, S. , Hornberger, M., Lebouvier, T., Piguet, O., Bourgeois-Gironde, S. & Bertoux, M. (2023). Zero the hero: Evidence for involvement of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in affective bias for free items. Cortex, 160, 24-42. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2022.12.009

Kim, S., Paulus, M., Sodian, B. & Proust, J. (2016). Young Children's Sensitivity to Their Own Ignorance in Informing Others. PloS one, 11(3), e0152595. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0152595

Proust, J. (2008). XIII-Epistemic Agency and Metacognition: An Externalist View. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society , 108(1pt3), 241–268

Branch-Smith, T. , Origgi, G. & Morisseau, T. (2022). Why Trust Raoult? How Social Indicators Inform the Reputations of Experts. Social Epistemology, 36(3), 299-316 . doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2042421

Proust, J. (2006). Why Evolution has to Matter to Cognitive Psychology and to Philosophy of Mind . Biological Theory, 1(4), 349-351

Engelen, T., Buot, A., Grèzes, J. & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2023). Whose emotion is it? Perspective matters to understand brain-body interactions in emotions. NeuroImage, 268, 119867. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119867

Stojanovic, I. (2009). When Truth Gives Out, by Mark Richard . Disputatio, 27, 150-158

Cepollaro, B., Domaneschi, F. & Stojanovic, I. (2020). When is it ok to call someone a jerk? An experimental investigation of expressives. Synthese, . doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02633-z

Stojanovic, I. (2010). When Is Action Intentional? A Problem for Ginet's Acausal Account of Intentional Action. Vox Philosophiae, 18-28

Stojanovic, I. (2003). What to Say on What Is Said. In Blackburn et al. (Eds.), Modeling and Using Context. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2680. (pp. 300-313). Berlin: Springer-Verlag

Stojanovic, I. (2007). What Is Said as Lexical Meaning. Cadernos de Filosofia, 21, 7-42

Chambon, V., Domenech, P., Pacherie, E., Koechlin, E., Baraduc, P. & Farrer, C. (2011). What are they up to? The role of sensory evidence and prior knowledge in action understanding. PloS one, 6(2), e17133. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017133

Pacherie, E. & Haggard, P. (2010). What Are Intentions? . (pp. 70–84).

Buehler, D. (2020). Warrant from transsaccadic vision. Mind and Language, 36(3), 404-421. doi:10.1111/mila.12277

Chevallier, C. (2021). Vivre dans un environnement risqué : quels impacts pour la psychologie ? In Claudia Senik (Eds.), Sociétés en danger (Odile Jacob ed., pp. 197 à 208). Paris: La Découverte. doi:10.3917/dec.senik.2021.01.0197

Recanati, F. (2022). Understanding Force Cancellation. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy , . doi:10.1080/0020174X.2022.2075920

Verheyen, S. & Egré, P. (2018). Typicality and Graded Membership in Dimensional Adjectives. Cognitive Science, 42(7 ), 2250–2286

Pichon, S., De Gelder, B. & Grèzes, J. (2009). Two different faces of threat. Comparing the neural systems for recognizing fear and anger in dynamic body expressions. NeuroImage, 47(4), 1873-83. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.084

Origgi, G., Branch-Smith, T. & Morisseau, T. (2021). Trust, expertise and the controversy over chloroquine. Social Epistemology A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy

Origgi, G. (2019). Trust and Reputation as Filtering Mechanisms of Knowledge. In P. Graham (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology London: Routledge

Origgi, G. (2020). Trust and Reputation. In Judith Simon (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Trust and PhilosophyRoutledge

Recanati, F. (2021). Transparent Coreference. Topoi, 40(1), 107–115. doi:10.1007/s11245-019-09674-1

Sidarus, N., Palminteri, S. & Chambon, V. (2018). Trading off the cost of conflict against expected rewards. Plos Computational Biology, 42809. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007326

Remme, M., Lengyel, M. & Gutkin, B. (2015). Trade-off between dendritic democracy and independence in neurons with intrinsic subthreshold membrane potential oscillatio. In Remme et al (eds) (Eds.), Dendritic ComputationSpringer

Safra, L., Chevallier, C., Grèzes, J. & Baumard, N. (2020). Tracking historical changes in trustworthiness using machine learning analyses of facial cues in painting. Nature Communications, 11, 4728. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18566-7

Pacherie, E. (2006). Towards a Dynamic Theory of Intentions . (pp. 145-167).

Butterfill , S. & Pacherie, E. (2020). Towards a blueprint for a social animal. In Fiebich, Anika (Eds.), Minimal Cooperation and Shared Agency (pp. 111-125).Springer . doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29783-1

Dokic, J. & Pacherie, E. (2007). Too much ado about beliefs. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(1-2), 185-200. doi:10.1007/s11097-006-9036-9

Jones, B. , DeBruine, L. , .., .., Chevallier, C. & (Et Al), . (2021). To which world regions does the valence–dominance model of social perception apply? Nat Hum Behav, 5, 159-169. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.7611443.v1

Collins, T. & Jacquet, P. (2018). TMS over posterior parietal cortex disrupts trans-saccadic visual stability. Brain stimulation, 11(2), 390-399. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.019