Publications

de Cheveigné, A. (2019). ZapLine: a simple and effective method to remove power line artifacts. NeuroImage, 207, 116356. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116356

Sundara, M., Ngon, C., Skoruppa, K., Feldman, N., Onario Glenda, M., Morgan, J. & Peperkamp, S. (2018). Young infants’ discrimination of subtle phonetic contrasts. Cognition, 178, 57-66. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.009

Havron, N., Babineau, M., Fiévet, A., de Carvalho, A. & Christophe, A. (2019). Young Children Build Syntactic Predictions During Language Processing and Use Them to Learn Novel-Word Meanings. In The 44th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, USA.

Dautriche, I., Mahowald, K., Gibson, E., Christophe, A. & Piantadosi, S. (2017). Words cluster phonetically beyond phonotactic regularities. Cognition, 163, 128-145. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.001

Dautriche, I., Chemla, E. & Christophe, A. (2016). Word Learning: Homophony and the Distribution of Learning Exemplars. Language Learning and Development, 12(3), 231-251. doi:10.1080/15475441.2015.1127163

de Cheveigné, A. (2023). Why is the perceptual octave stretched? An account based on mismatched time constants within the auditory brainstem. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 153(5), 2600. doi:10.1121/10.0017978

Boubenec, Y., Shulz, D. & Debrégeas, G. (2012). Whisker encoding of mechanical events during active tactile exploration. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 6:74, 1-16. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00074

Claverie, L., Boubenec, Y., Debrégeas, G., Prevost, A. & Wandersman, E. (2017). Whisker Contact Detection of Rodents Based on Slow and Fast Mechanical Inputs. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 10, 251. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00251

Guevara-Rukoz, A., Lin, I., Morii, M., Minagawa, Y., Dupoux, E. & Peperkamp, S. (2017). Which epenthetic vowel? Phonetic categories versus acoustic detail in perceptual vowel epenthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(2), EL211-EL217. doi:10.1121/1.4998138

Dupoux, E., Parlato, E., Frota, S., Hirose, Y. & Peperkamp, S. (2011). Where do illusory vowels come from? Journal of Memory and Language, 64(3), 199-210. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.004

Cousineau, M., Demany, L. & Pressnitzer, D. (2009). What makes a melody: The perceptual singularity of pitch sequences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(6), 3179-87. doi:10.1121/1.3257206

Lakretz, Y. , Dehaene, S. & King, J. (2020). What Limits Our Capacity to Process Nested Long-Range Dependencies in Sentence Comprehension? Entropy, 22(4), 446. doi:10.3390/e22040446

Cousineau, M., Carcagno, S., Demany, L. & Pressnitzer, D. (2014). What is a melody? On the relationship between pitch and brightness of timbre. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 7, 127. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00127

Ngon, C. & Peperkamp, S. (2016). What infants know about the unsaid: Phonological categorization in the absence of auditory input. Cognition, 152, 53-60. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.014

Dautriche, I. & Chemla, E. (2016 ). What Homophones Say about Words. PLOS ONE, 11(9), 1-2. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162176

Turnbull, R. & Peperkamp, S. (2017). What governs a language's lexicon? Determining the organizing principles of phonological neighbourhood networks. In Complex Networks & Their Applications V. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Complex Networks and their Applications, 83-94. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50901-3_7

Grinfeder, E., Lorenzi, C., Haupert, S. & Sueur, J. (2022). What Do We Mean by “Soundscape”? A Functional Description. Front. Ecol. Evol, 10, 894232. doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.894232

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E. & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). What Do Monkey Calls Mean? Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(12), 894-904. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.004

Cousineau, M., Demany, L., Meyer, B. & Pressnitzer, D. (2010). What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant. Hearing research, 269(1-2), 34-41. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2010.07.007

Agus, T., Paquette, S., Suied, C., Pressnitzer, D. & Belin, P. (2017). Voice selectivity in the temporal voice area despite matched low-level acoustic cues. Scientific reports, 7(1), 11526. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11684-1

Babineau, M., Legrand, C. & Shi, R. (2021). Variable forms in French-learning toddlers' lexical representations. . doi:10.1037/dev0001157

Paraouty, N. & Lorenzi, C. (2017). Using individual differences to assess modulation-processing mechanisms and age effects. Hearing research, 344, 38-49. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.024

Osses , A. & Varnet, L. (2023). Using auditory models to mimic human listeners in reverse correlation experiments from the fastACI toolbox. In , Turin, Italy.

Dailey, M., Straboni, C. & Peperkamp, S. (2023). Using allophonic variation in L2 word recognition: French listeners’ processing of English vowel nasalization. Second Language Research. doi:10.1177/02676583231181472

Mehler, J., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Altmann, G., Dupoux, E., Christophe, A. & Pallier, C. (1993 ). Understanding compressed sentences - The role of rhythm and meaning. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 682, 272-282

Bernal, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Millotte, S. & Christophe, A. (2010). Two-year-olds compute syntactic structure on-line. Developmental science, 13(1), 69-76. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00865.x

Pressnitzer, D. & Mcadams, S. (1999). Two phase effects in roughness perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105(5), 2773-2782. doi:10.1121/1.426894

Križ, M. & Chemla, E. (). Two Methods to Find Truth-Value Gaps and Their Application to the Projection Problem of Homogeneity. Natural Language Semantics, 23(3), 205–248

Demany, L., Pressnitzer, D. & Semal, C. (2009). Tuning properties of the auditory frequency-shift detectors. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(3), 1342-8. doi:10.1121/1.3179675

Chemla, E. & Singh, R. (2017). Training and timing local scalar enrichments under global pragmatic pressures. Journal of Semantics, 34(1), 107-126. doi:10.1093/jos/ffw006