Publications

Sundara, M., Ngon, C., Skoruppa, K., Feldman, N., Onario Glenda, M., Morgan, J. & Peperkamp, S. (2018). Young infants’ discrimination of subtle phonetic contrasts. Cognition, 178, 57-66. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.009

Havron, N., Babineau, M., Fiévet, A., de Carvalho, A. & Christophe, A. (2019). Young Children Build Syntactic Predictions During Language Processing and Use Them to Learn Novel-Word Meanings. In The 44th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, USA.

Dautriche, I., Mahowald, K., Gibson, E., Christophe, A. & Piantadosi, S. (2017). Words cluster phonetically beyond phonotactic regularities. Cognition, 163, 128-145. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.001

Dautriche, I., Chemla, E. & Christophe, A. (2016). Word Learning: Homophony and the Distribution of Learning Exemplars. Language Learning and Development, 12(3), 231-251. doi:10.1080/15475441.2015.1127163

Guevara-Rukoz, A., Lin, I., Morii, M., Minagawa, Y., Dupoux, E. & Peperkamp, S. (2017). Which epenthetic vowel? Phonetic categories versus acoustic detail in perceptual vowel epenthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(2), EL211-EL217. doi:10.1121/1.4998138

Dupoux, E., Parlato, E., Frota, S., Hirose, Y. & Peperkamp, S. (2011). Where do illusory vowels come from? Journal of Memory and Language, 64(3), 199-210. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.004

Recht, S. , Mamassian, P. & de Gardelle, V. (2018). When temporal attention lacks confidence. bioRxiv, 496232

Jovanovic, L. & Mamassian, P. (2019). When an Event Is Perceived Depends on Where We Attend. I-Perception, 10(3), 2041669519858096. doi:10.1177/2041669519858096

Jovanovic, L. & Mamassian, P. (2018). When a visual event is perceived depends on where it is presented. Journal of Vision, 18(10), 714-714. doi:10.1167/18.10.714

Jovanovic, L. & Mamassian, P. (2019). When a Visual Event Is Perceived Depends on How We Attend to Its Temporal Context. Perception, 48, 146

de Vignemont, F. (2020). What Phenomenal Contrast for Bodily Ownership? Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 6(1), 117-137. doi:10.1017/apa.2019.34

de Vignemont, F. (2021). What is the body schema? In Yochai Ataria, Shogo Tanaka, and Shaun Gallagher (Eds.), Body Schema and Body Image: New Directions. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198851721.003.0001

Ngon, C. & Peperkamp, S. (2016). What infants know about the unsaid: Phonological categorization in the absence of auditory input. Cognition, 152, 53-60. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.014

Dautriche, I. & Chemla, E. (2016 ). What Homophones Say about Words. PLOS ONE, 11(9), 1-2. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162176

Turnbull, R. & Peperkamp, S. (2017). What governs a language's lexicon? Determining the organizing principles of phonological neighbourhood networks. In Complex Networks & Their Applications V. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Complex Networks and their Applications, 83-94. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50901-3_7

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E. & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). What Do Monkey Calls Mean? Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(12), 894-904. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.004

de Vignemont, F. (2018). Was Descartes right after all? An affective background for bodily awareness. . In Tsakiris, Manos de Preester, Helena (Eds.), The Interoceptive Basis of the Mind: from homeostasis to awareness Oxford: Oxford University Press

Balsdon, T. & Clifford, C. (2018). Visual processing: conscious until proven otherwise. Royal Society open science, 5(1), 171783. doi:10.1098/rsos.171783

Balsdon, T. & Clifford, C. (2018). Visual processing: conscious until proven otherwise. , 5(1). doi:10.1098/rsos.171783

Ota, K. , Wu, Q. & Mamassian, P. (2020). Visual cue estimation with non-gaussian distribution. Journal of vision, 20(11). doi:10.1167/jov.20.11.1436

Lunghi, C., Galli-Resta, L., Binda, P., Cicchini, G., Placidi, G., Falsini, B. & Morrone, M. (2019). Visual Cortical Plasticity in Retinitis Pigmentosa. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 60(7), 2753-2763. doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25750

Lunghi, C. (2020). Visual Cortex Rewiring in Retinitis Pigmentosa: Plasticity is Preserved. Neuroscience, 424, 203-204. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.10.053

Klever, L. , Mamassian, P. & Billino, J. (2019). Visual Confidence in Younger and Older Adults: What Drives Individual Differences in Metaperception? Perception

Mamassian, P. (2016). Visual Confidence. Annual Review of Vision Science, 2, 459-481. doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114630

de Vignemont, F. (2018). Varieties of bodily feelings. In Kriegel, Uriah (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of consciousness Oxford: Oxford University Press

Babineau, M., Legrand, C. & Shi, R. (2021). Variable forms in French-learning toddlers' lexical representations. . doi:10.1037/dev0001157

Alsmith, A. & Longo, M. (2019). Using VR technologies to investigate the flexibility of human self-conception. In E. Fischer and M. Curtis (Eds.), Methodological Advances in Experimental Philosophy (pp. 153-174). London: Bloomsbury

Dailey, M., Straboni, C. & Peperkamp, S. (2023). Using allophonic variation in L2 word recognition: French listeners’ processing of English vowel nasalization. Second Language Research. doi:10.1177/02676583231181472

Massin, O. & de Vignemont, F. (2020). Unless I Put My Hand into His Side, I Will Not Believe: The Epistemic Privilege of touch. In Berit Brogaard & Dimitria Electra Gatzia (Eds.), The Epistemology of non-Visual Perception (pp. 165).Oxford University Press

Vacher, J. , Coen-Cagli, R. & Mamassian, P. (2022). Unifying Different Psychometric Methods : Theory and Experiment. Journal of Vision, 22, 3879. doi:10.1167/jov.22.14.3879