Publications

de Cheveigné, A. (2019). ZapLine: a simple and effective method to remove power line artifacts. NeuroImage, 207, 116356. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116356

de Cheveigné, A. (2023). Why is the perceptual octave stretched? An account based on mismatched time constants within the auditory brainstem. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 153(5), 2600. doi:10.1121/10.0017978

Engelen, T., Buot, A., Grèzes, J. & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2023). Whose emotion is it? Perspective matters to understand brain-body interactions in emotions. NeuroImage, 268, 119867. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119867

Boubenec, Y., Shulz, D. & Debrégeas, G. (2012). Whisker encoding of mechanical events during active tactile exploration. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 6:74, 1-16. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00074

Claverie, L., Boubenec, Y., Debrégeas, G., Prevost, A. & Wandersman, E. (2017). Whisker Contact Detection of Rodents Based on Slow and Fast Mechanical Inputs. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 10, 251. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00251

Stojanovic, I. (2009). When Truth Gives Out, by Mark Richard . Disputatio, 27, 150-158

Recht, S. , Mamassian, P. & de Gardelle, V. (2018). When temporal attention lacks confidence. bioRxiv, 496232

Cepollaro, B., Domaneschi, F. & Stojanovic, I. (2020). When is it ok to call someone a jerk? An experimental investigation of expressives. Synthese, . doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02633-z

Stojanovic, I. (2010). When Is Action Intentional? A Problem for Ginet's Acausal Account of Intentional Action. Vox Philosophiae, 18-28

Jovanovic, L. & Mamassian, P. (2019). When an Event Is Perceived Depends on Where We Attend. I-Perception, 10(3), 2041669519858096. doi:10.1177/2041669519858096

Jovanovic, L. & Mamassian, P. (2018). When a visual event is perceived depends on where it is presented. Journal of Vision, 18(10), 714-714. doi:10.1167/18.10.714

Jovanovic, L. & Mamassian, P. (2019). When a Visual Event Is Perceived Depends on How We Attend to Its Temporal Context. Perception, 48, 146

Stojanovic, I. (2003). What to Say on What Is Said. In Blackburn et al. (Eds.), Modeling and Using Context. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2680. (pp. 300-313). Berlin: Springer-Verlag

Cousineau, M., Demany, L. & Pressnitzer, D. (2009). What makes a melody: The perceptual singularity of pitch sequences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(6), 3179-87. doi:10.1121/1.3257206

Lakretz, Y. , Dehaene, S. & King, J. (2020). What Limits Our Capacity to Process Nested Long-Range Dependencies in Sentence Comprehension? Entropy, 22(4), 446. doi:10.3390/e22040446

Stojanovic, I. (2007). What Is Said as Lexical Meaning. Cadernos de Filosofia, 21, 7-42

Cousineau, M., Carcagno, S., Demany, L. & Pressnitzer, D. (2014). What is a melody? On the relationship between pitch and brightness of timbre. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 7, 127. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00127

Grinfeder, E., Lorenzi, C., Haupert, S. & Sueur, J. (2022). What Do We Mean by “Soundscape”? A Functional Description. Front. Ecol. Evol, 10, 894232. doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.894232

Cousineau, M., Demany, L., Meyer, B. & Pressnitzer, D. (2010). What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant. Hearing research, 269(1-2), 34-41. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2010.07.007

Agus, T., Paquette, S., Suied, C., Pressnitzer, D. & Belin, P. (2017). Voice selectivity in the temporal voice area despite matched low-level acoustic cues. Scientific reports, 7(1), 11526. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11684-1

Chevallier, C. (2021). Vivre dans un environnement risqué : quels impacts pour la psychologie ? In Claudia Senik (Eds.), Sociétés en danger (Odile Jacob ed., pp. 197 à 208). Paris: La Découverte. doi:10.3917/dec.senik.2021.01.0197

Balsdon, T. & Clifford, C. (2018). Visual processing: conscious until proven otherwise. Royal Society open science, 5(1), 171783. doi:10.1098/rsos.171783

Balsdon, T. & Clifford, C. (2018). Visual processing: conscious until proven otherwise. , 5(1). doi:10.1098/rsos.171783

Ota, K. , Wu, Q. & Mamassian, P. (2020). Visual cue estimation with non-gaussian distribution. Journal of vision, 20(11). doi:10.1167/jov.20.11.1436

Lunghi, C., Galli-Resta, L., Binda, P., Cicchini, G., Placidi, G., Falsini, B. & Morrone, M. (2019). Visual Cortical Plasticity in Retinitis Pigmentosa. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 60(7), 2753-2763. doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25750

Lunghi, C. (2020). Visual Cortex Rewiring in Retinitis Pigmentosa: Plasticity is Preserved. Neuroscience, 424, 203-204. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.10.053

Klever, L. , Mamassian, P. & Billino, J. (2019). Visual Confidence in Younger and Older Adults: What Drives Individual Differences in Metaperception? Perception

Mamassian, P. (2016). Visual Confidence. Annual Review of Vision Science, 2, 459-481. doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114630

Paraouty, N. & Lorenzi, C. (2017). Using individual differences to assess modulation-processing mechanisms and age effects. Hearing research, 344, 38-49. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.024

Osses , A. & Varnet, L. (2023). Using auditory models to mimic human listeners in reverse correlation experiments from the fastACI toolbox. In , Turin, Italy.