Publications

de Cheveigné, A. (2019). ZapLine: a simple and effective method to remove power line artifacts. NeuroImage, 207, 116356. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116356

Havron, N., Babineau, M., Fiévet, A., de Carvalho, A. & Christophe, A. (2019). Young Children Build Syntactic Predictions During Language Processing and Use Them to Learn Novel-Word Meanings. In The 44th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, USA.

Bernard, M., Thiollière, R., Saksida, A., Loukatou, G., Larsen, E., Johnson, M., Fibla, L., Dupoux, E., Daland, R., Cao, X. & Cristia, A. (2020). WordSeg: Standardizing unsupervised word form segmentation from text. Behavior research methods, 52(1), 264-278. doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01223-3

Seidl, A., Cristia, A., Baker, C. & Tincoff, R. (2015). Why the body comes first: effects of experimenter touch on infants' word finding. Developmental Science, 18(1), 155-164. doi:10.1111/desc.12182

de Cheveigné, A. (2023). Why is the perceptual octave stretched? An account based on mismatched time constants within the auditory brainstem. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 153(5), 2600. doi:10.1121/10.0017978

Boubenec, Y., Shulz, D. & Debrégeas, G. (2012). Whisker encoding of mechanical events during active tactile exploration. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 6:74, 1-16. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00074

Claverie, L., Boubenec, Y., Debrégeas, G., Prevost, A. & Wandersman, E. (2017). Whisker Contact Detection of Rodents Based on Slow and Fast Mechanical Inputs. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 10, 251. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00251

Recht, S. , Mamassian, P. & de Gardelle, V. (2018). When temporal attention lacks confidence. bioRxiv, 496232

Jovanovic, L. & Mamassian, P. (2019). When an Event Is Perceived Depends on Where We Attend. I-Perception, 10(3), 2041669519858096. doi:10.1177/2041669519858096

Jovanovic, L. & Mamassian, P. (2018). When a visual event is perceived depends on where it is presented. Journal of Vision, 18(10), 714-714. doi:10.1167/18.10.714

Jovanovic, L. & Mamassian, P. (2019). When a Visual Event Is Perceived Depends on How We Attend to Its Temporal Context. Perception, 48, 146

de Vignemont, F. (2020). What Phenomenal Contrast for Bodily Ownership? Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 6(1), 117-137. doi:10.1017/apa.2019.34

Cousineau, M., Demany, L. & Pressnitzer, D. (2009). What makes a melody: The perceptual singularity of pitch sequences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(6), 3179-87. doi:10.1121/1.3257206

Lakretz, Y. , Dehaene, S. & King, J. (2020). What Limits Our Capacity to Process Nested Long-Range Dependencies in Sentence Comprehension? Entropy, 22(4), 446. doi:10.3390/e22040446

Schlenker, P. (2019). What is Super Semantics? Philosophical perspectives, 32, 365-453. doi:10.1111/phpe.12122

Cousineau, M., Carcagno, S., Demany, L. & Pressnitzer, D. (2014). What is a melody? On the relationship between pitch and brightness of timbre. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 7, 127. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00127

Grinfeder, E., Lorenzi, C., Haupert, S. & Sueur, J. (2022). What Do We Mean by “Soundscape”? A Functional Description. Front. Ecol. Evol, 10, 894232. doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.894232

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E. & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). What Do Monkey Calls Mean? Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(12), 894-904. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.004

Cousineau, M., Demany, L., Meyer, B. & Pressnitzer, D. (2010). What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant. Hearing research, 269(1-2), 34-41. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2010.07.007

Ladenbauer, J. & Obermayer, K. (2019). Weak electric fields promote resonance in neuronal spiking activity: Analytical results from two-compartment cell and network models. PLOS Computational Biology, 15(4), e1006974. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006974

Agus, T., Paquette, S., Suied, C., Pressnitzer, D. & Belin, P. (2017). Voice selectivity in the temporal voice area despite matched low-level acoustic cues. Scientific reports, 7(1), 11526. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11684-1

Cristia, A., Gautheron, L. & Colleran, H. (2023). Vocal input and output among infants in a multilingual context: Evidence from long-form recordings in Vanuatu. Developmental science, e13375. doi:10.1111/desc.13375

Balsdon, T. & Clifford, C. (2018). Visual processing: conscious until proven otherwise. Royal Society open science, 5(1), 171783. doi:10.1098/rsos.171783

Balsdon, T. & Clifford, C. (2018). Visual processing: conscious until proven otherwise. , 5(1). doi:10.1098/rsos.171783

Strickland, B. & J. Scholl, B. (2015). Visual Perception Involves Event-Type Representations: The Case of Containment Versus Occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 570–580. doi:10.1037/a0037750

Ota, K. , Wu, Q. & Mamassian, P. (2020). Visual cue estimation with non-gaussian distribution. Journal of vision, 20(11). doi:10.1167/jov.20.11.1436

Lunghi, C., Galli-Resta, L., Binda, P., Cicchini, G., Placidi, G., Falsini, B. & Morrone, M. (2019). Visual Cortical Plasticity in Retinitis Pigmentosa. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 60(7), 2753-2763. doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25750

Lunghi, C. (2020). Visual Cortex Rewiring in Retinitis Pigmentosa: Plasticity is Preserved. Neuroscience, 424, 203-204. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.10.053

Klever, L. , Mamassian, P. & Billino, J. (2019). Visual Confidence in Younger and Older Adults: What Drives Individual Differences in Metaperception? Perception

Mamassian, P. (2016). Visual Confidence. Annual Review of Vision Science, 2, 459-481. doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114630