Publications

de Vignemont, F. (2018). Peripersonal perception in action. Synthese, 1-18. doi:10.1007/s11229-018-01962-4

de Vignemont, F. (2018). Was Descartes right after all? An affective background for bodily awareness. . In Tsakiris, Manos de Preester, Helena (Eds.), The Interoceptive Basis of the Mind: from homeostasis to awareness Oxford: Oxford University Press

de Vignemont, F. (2018). Varieties of bodily feelings. In Kriegel, Uriah (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of consciousness Oxford: Oxford University Press

de Vignemont, F. (2019). Against phenomenal parsimony: a plea for bodily feelings. In Goldman, Alvin McLaughlin, McLaughlin (Eds.), Metaphysics and cognitive science Oxford: Oxford University Press

de Vignemont, F. (2019). The phenomenology of bodily ownership. In Guillot, Marie Garcia-Carpintero, Manuel (Eds.), The sense of mineness Oxford: Oxford University Press

de Vignemont, F. (2018). The first-person in pain. In Bain, D., Brady, M., Corns, J. (Eds.), Philosophy of Pain: Unpleasantness, Emotion, and DevianceRoutledge

de Vignemont, F. (2007). How Many Representations of the Body? Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 30(2), 204–205

Denic, M. & Chemla, E. (2020). Quantifier Spreading in Child Language as Distributive Inferences. Linguistic Inquiry, 51(1), 1-21. doi:10.1162/ling_a_00340

Dezecache, G., Bourgeois-Gironde, S., Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Bazin, C. & Maille, A. (2019). Orangutans’ Comprehension of Zoo Keepers’ Communicative Signals. Animals , 9(6), 300. doi:10.3390/ani9060300

Dieuleveut, A., Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2019 ). Distinctions between primary and secondary scalar implicatures. Journal of Memory and Language, 106, 150-171. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2019.02.008

Dominijanni, G. , Shokur, S. , Salvietti, G. , Palmerini, E. , Rossi, S. , de Vignemont, F., d’Avella, A. , Makin, T., Prattichizzo, D. & Micera , S. (2021). The neural resource allocation problem when enhancing human bodies with extra robotic limbs. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3, 850-860. doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00398-9

Longo, M., Rajapakse , S., Alsmith, A. & Ferre , F. (2020). Shared contributions of the head and torso to spatial reference frames across spatial judgments. Cognition, .

Makin, T. & de Vignemont, F. (2020). Soft Embodiment for Engineering Artificial. Trends in Cognitive, 4(12), 965-968. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.09.008

Maldonado, M., Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2019). Revealing abstract semantic mechanisms through priming: The distributive/collective contrast. Cognition, 182, 171-176. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.009

Maldonado, M., Spector, B. & Chemla, E. (2017). Priming methods in semantics and pragmatics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40. doi:10.1017/S0140525X17000516

Maldonado, M., Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2017). Priming plural ambiguities. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 89-101. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2017.02.002

Marty, P., Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2013). Interpreting numerals and scalar items under memory load. Lingua, 133, 152 - 163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.03.006

Marty, P., Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2015). Phantom readings: the case of modified numerals. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(4), 462-477. doi:10.1080/23273798.2014.931592

Massin, O. & de Vignemont, F. (2020). Unless I Put My Hand into His Side, I Will Not Believe: The Epistemic Privilege of touch. In Berit Brogaard & Dimitria Electra Gatzia (Eds.), The Epistemology of non-Visual Perception (pp. 165).Oxford University Press

O'Madagain, C., Kachel , G. & Strickland, B. (2019). The Origin of Pointing: Evidence for the Touch Hypothesis. Science Advances, 5(7), eaav2558. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav2558

O'Madagain, C., Kachel , G. & Strickland, B. (2019). The origin of pointing: Evidence for the touch hypothesis. Science Advances, 5(7), eaav2558. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav2558

O'Madagain, C. (2019). Epistemic Injustice at the Conceptual Level: Are We Entitled to Our Own Concepts? Studia Philosophica Estonica, 12, 64-80

Pitron, V., Alsmith, A. & de Vignemont, F. (2018). How do the body schema and the body image interact? . Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 352-358. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.08.007

Schlenker, P. & Chemla, E. (2017). Gestural agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 36(2), 587–625. doi:10.1007/s11049-017-9378-8

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Schel, A., Fuller, J., Gautier, J., Kuhn, J., Veselinović, D., Arnold, K., Cäsar, C., Keenan, S., Lemasson, A., Ouattara, K., Ryder, R. & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). Formal monkey linguistics: The debate. Theoretical Linguistics, 42(1-2), 173-201. doi:10.1515/tl-2016-0010

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Cäsar, C., Zuberbühler, K. & Ryder, R. (2017). Titi semantics: Context and meaning in Titi monkey call sequences. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 35(1), 271-298. doi:10.1007/s11049-016-9337-9

Schlenker, P. & Chemla, E. (2018). Gestural agreement. Natural Language & , 36(2), 587-625. doi:10.1007/s11049-017-9378-8

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Arnold, K., Lemasson, A., Ouattara, K., Keenan, S., Stephan, C., Ryder, R. & Zuberbühler, K. (2013). Towards a formal analysis of primate alarm calls. In 23rd Semantics and Linguistics Theory Conference.

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Arnold, K., Lemasson, A., Ouattara, K., Keenan, S., Stephan, C., Ryder, R. & Zuberbühler, K. (2013). Dialectal variation in the meanings of Campbell’s monkey alarm calls. In XIXth International Congress of Linguists (ICL19)-Workshop" Language variation at the interface of psycholinguistics and sociolinguistics".

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E. & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). What Do Monkey Calls Mean? Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(12), 894-904. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.004