Publications

Lenglin, V., Wong, S. , O'Callaghan, C. , Erzinçlioǧlu, S. , Hornberger, M., Lebouvier, T., Piguet, O., Bourgeois-Gironde, S. & Bertoux, M. (2023). Zero the hero: Evidence for involvement of the ventromedial prefrontal cortex in affective bias for free items. Cortex, 160, 24-42. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2022.12.009

Sundara, M., Ngon, C., Skoruppa, K., Feldman, N., Onario Glenda, M., Morgan, J. & Peperkamp, S. (2018). Young infants’ discrimination of subtle phonetic contrasts. Cognition, 178, 57-66. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.009

Havron, N., Babineau, M., Fiévet, A., de Carvalho, A. & Christophe, A. (2019). Young Children Build Syntactic Predictions During Language Processing and Use Them to Learn Novel-Word Meanings. In The 44th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, USA.

Dautriche, I., Mahowald, K., Gibson, E., Christophe, A. & Piantadosi, S. (2017). Words cluster phonetically beyond phonotactic regularities. Cognition, 163, 128-145. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.001

Dautriche, I., Chemla, E. & Christophe, A. (2016). Word Learning: Homophony and the Distribution of Learning Exemplars. Language Learning and Development, 12(3), 231-251. doi:10.1080/15475441.2015.1127163

Guevara-Rukoz, A., Lin, I., Morii, M., Minagawa, Y., Dupoux, E. & Peperkamp, S. (2017). Which epenthetic vowel? Phonetic categories versus acoustic detail in perceptual vowel epenthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(2), EL211-EL217. doi:10.1121/1.4998138

Dupoux, E., Parlato, E., Frota, S., Hirose, Y. & Peperkamp, S. (2011). Where do illusory vowels come from? Journal of Memory and Language, 64(3), 199-210. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.004

Stojanovic, I. (2009). When Truth Gives Out, by Mark Richard . Disputatio, 27, 150-158

Cepollaro, B., Domaneschi, F. & Stojanovic, I. (2020). When is it ok to call someone a jerk? An experimental investigation of expressives. Synthese, . doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02633-z

Stojanovic, I. (2010). When Is Action Intentional? A Problem for Ginet's Acausal Account of Intentional Action. Vox Philosophiae, 18-28

Stojanovic, I. (2003). What to Say on What Is Said. In Blackburn et al. (Eds.), Modeling and Using Context. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2680. (pp. 300-313). Berlin: Springer-Verlag

Schlenker, P. (2022). What It All Means. The MIT Press

Schlenker, P. (2019). What is Super Semantics? Philosophical perspectives, 32, 365-453. doi:10.1111/phpe.12122

Stojanovic, I. (2007). What Is Said as Lexical Meaning. Cadernos de Filosofia, 21, 7-42

Ngon, C. & Peperkamp, S. (2016). What infants know about the unsaid: Phonological categorization in the absence of auditory input. Cognition, 152, 53-60. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.014

Dautriche, I. & Chemla, E. (2016 ). What Homophones Say about Words. PLOS ONE, 11(9), 1-2. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162176

Turnbull, R. & Peperkamp, S. (2017). What governs a language's lexicon? Determining the organizing principles of phonological neighbourhood networks. In Complex Networks & Their Applications V. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Complex Networks and their Applications, 83-94. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50901-3_7

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E. & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). What Do Monkey Calls Mean? Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(12), 894-904. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.004

Chambon, V., Domenech, P., Pacherie, E., Koechlin, E., Baraduc, P. & Farrer, C. (2011). What are they up to? The role of sensory evidence and prior knowledge in action understanding. PloS one, 6(2), e17133. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017133

Pacherie, E. & Haggard, P. (2010). What Are Intentions? . (pp. 70–84).

Branchini, C., Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C., Donati, C. & Geraci, C. (2015). WH-duplication in Italian Sign Language (LIS) , 39–70John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/bct.71.03bra

Buehler, D. (2020). Warrant from transsaccadic vision. Mind and Language, 36(3), 404-421. doi:10.1111/mila.12277

Strickland, B. & J. Scholl, B. (2015). Visual Perception Involves Event-Type Representations: The Case of Containment Versus Occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 570–580. doi:10.1037/a0037750

Dokic & Pascal Engel, J. (2018). Visual Awareness and Visual Appearances. A Dual View. In F. Dorsch & F. Macpherson (Eds.), Phenomenal Presence (pp. 181-198). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780199666416.003.0008

Schlenker, P. (2018). Visible Meaning: Sign language and the foundations of semantics. Theoretical Linguistics, 44(3-4), 123-208. doi:10.1515/tl-2018-0012

Aristodemo, V. & Geraci, C. (2017). Visible degrees in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language {&} Linguistic Theory, -(on line). doi:10.1007/s11049-017-9389-5

Geraci, C., Bayley, R., Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C. & Donati, C. (2015). Variation in Italian Sign Language (LIS): The case of wh -signs. Linguistics, 53(1), 125–151. doi:10.1515/ling-2014-0031

Babineau, M., Legrand, C. & Shi, R. (2021). Variable forms in French-learning toddlers' lexical representations. . doi:10.1037/dev0001157

Dailey, M., Straboni, C. & Peperkamp, S. (2023). Using allophonic variation in L2 word recognition: French listeners’ processing of English vowel nasalization. Second Language Research. doi:10.1177/02676583231181472

Ruys, E. & Spector, B. (2017). Unexpected Wide-Scope Phenomena. In Everaert, Martin and Henk C. Van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Companion to SyntaxWiley. doi:10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom089