Publications

Stojanovic, I. (2001). For Whom is the Problem of the Essential Indexical a Problem? . (pp. 304-315).

Nicolas, D. (2002). La catégorisation des noms communs : massifs et comptables. Catégorisation et Langage (pp. 29-51).

Stojanovic, I. (2003). What to Say on What Is Said. In Blackburn et al. (Eds.), Modeling and Using Context. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2680. (pp. 300-313). Berlin: Springer-Verlag

Nicolas, D. (2005). Types of degrees and types of event structures. Event arguments: foundations and applications (pp. 277-300).

Stojanovic, I. (2005). A Different Story about Indexicals. , Amsterdam: ILLC Research Reports

Nicolas, D. (2006). Massif / comptable. Sémanticlopédie: dictionnaire de sémantique

Nicolas, D. (2006). Compositionalité: questions philosophiques. Sémanticlopédie: dictionnaire de sémantique

Nicolas, D. (2006). Ambiguïté. Sémanticlopédie: dictionnaire de sémantique

De Brabanter, P., Nicolas, D., Stojanovic, I. & Villanueva Fernandez, N. (2007). Les usages déférentiels. In Bouvier, Alban and Conein, Bernard (Eds.), L'épistémologie sociale. Une théorie sociale de la connaissance (pp. 139-162).Editions de l'EHESS

Stojanovic, I. (2007). What Is Said as Lexical Meaning. Cadernos de Filosofia, 21, 7-42

Predelli, S. & Stojanovic, I. (2008). Semantic Relativism and the Logic of Indexicals. (pp. 63–90).

Stojanovic, I. (2009). The Vicious Triangle of A Priori Truth, Contingent Truth, and Logical Truth. (pp. 69–82).

Stojanovic, I. (2010). Referring with Proper Names: Towards a Pragmatic Account. (pp. 139-160).

Stojanovic, I. (2010). When Is Action Intentional? A Problem for Ginet's Acausal Account of Intentional Action. Vox Philosophiae, 18-28

Stojanovic, I. (2011). Context, Meaning and Logical Truth. In Gupta, A. and van Benthem, J. (Eds.), Logic and Philosophy Today (Vol. 30, pp. 11-24). London: College Publications, Studies in Logic Series

Stojanovic, I. (2012). Situation Semantics. (pp. 67-86).

Stojanovic, I. (2012). Emotional Disagreement. The Role of Semantic Content in the Expression of, and Disagreement Over, Emotional Values. Dialogue, 51(1), 99-117

Stojanovic, I. (2013). Context and the Attitudes.

Asic, T. & Corblin, F. (2014). Telic definties and their prepositions. French and Serbian. In Aguilar-Guevara, Ana, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts (Eds.), Weak Referentiality (pp. 183-212).Benjamins

Stojanovic, I. (2014). Prepragmatics: Widening the Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary . In Burgess, Alexis and Brett Sherman (Eds.), Metasemantics: New Essays on the Foundations of Meaning (pp. 311–326). Oxford: OUP

Stojanovic, I. (2014). Talking about the Future: Settled Truth and Assertion. In De Brabanter, Ph., Kissine, M. and Sharifzadeh, S. (Eds.), Future Times, Future Tenses (pp. 26-43).Oxford: OUP

Stojanovic, I. (2016). Speaking About Oneself. (pp. 200–219 ). doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198713265.003.0008

Stojanovic, I. (2016). Evaluative Predicates and Evaluative Uses of Ordinary Predicates. In Bekki, D. et al. (Eds.), New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence: JSAI-isAI 2015 Workshops, Revised Selected Papers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Series (pp. 128-140).Springer-Verlag

Giannakidou, A. & Mari, A. (2017). La dimension épistémique du futur : le rôle des adverbes. In Baranzini and de Saussures (Eds.), Le Futur dans les langues RomanesPeter Lang Ag

Fortier, M. & Kim, S. (2017). From the impossible to the improbable: A probabilistic account of magical beliefs and practices across development and cultures. In C. Zedelius, B. Müller & J. Schooler (Eds.), The science of lay theories: How beliefs shape our cognition, behavior, and health (pp. 265-315). New York: Springer

Recanati, F. (2017). About the lekton. Response to Max Kölbel. In I. Depraetere et R. Salkie (Eds.), Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line (pp. 215-224). Berlin: Springer

Recanati, F. (2017). Cognitive Dynamics: A New Look at an Old Problem. In M. de Ponte et K. Korta (Eds.), Reference and Representation in Thought and Language Oxford: Oxford University Press

Terrone, E. (2017). On Time in Cinema. In Ian Phillips (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Temporal Experience (pp. 326-338). New York: Routledge

Terrone, E. (2017). Character, Spectator, Film: On Cinema as a Plotinian Hierarchy. In Thorsten Botz-Bornstein e Giannis Stamatellos (Eds.), Plotinus and the Moving Image: Neoplatonism and Film Theory (pp. 144-177). Leiden: Brill/Rodopi. doi:10.1163/9789004357167_010

Terrone, E. (2017). “TheCinematic Relation: Singular Thought, Mental Files, and Film. In Lars C. Grabbe, Patrick Rupert-Kruse, Norbert M. Schmitz (Eds.), Bildverstehen. Spielarten und Ausprägungen der Verarbeitung multimodaler Bildmedien (pp. 16-30). Darmstadt: Büchner-Verlag