Publications

Pitron, V., Alsmith, A. & de Vignemont, F. (2018). How do the body schema and the body image interact? . Consciousness and Cognition, 65, 352-358. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.08.007

Pacherie, E. (2013). How does it feel to act together? Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1-21. doi:10.1007/s11097-013-9329-8

Seow, T., Rouault, M. & Stephen, F. (2021). How local and global metacognition shape mental health. Biological Psychiatry. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.05.013

de Vignemont, F. (2007). How Many Representations of the Body? Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 30(2), 204–205

Bourgeois-Gironde, S. (2017). How regret moves individual and collective choices towards rationality. Handbook of Behavioural Economics and Smart Decision-Making: Rational …

Balsdon, T. & Clifford, C. (2018). How wide is the cone of direct gaze? Royal Society open science, 5(8), 180249. doi:10.1098/rsos.180249

Balsdon, T. & Clifford, C. (2018). How wide is the cone of direct gaze? Royal Society open science 6, 5(8), 180249

Apelian, C., B Terhune, D. & de Vignemont, F. (2023). Hypnotic suggestion versus sensory modulation of bodily awareness. PloS one, 18(9), e0291493. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0291493

Mamassian, P. & Kersten, D. (1996). Illumination, shading and the perception of local orientation. Vision Research, 36(15), 2351-2367. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(95)00286-3

Kersten, D., Knill, D., Mamassian, P. & Bülthoff, I. (1996). Illusory motion from shadows. Nature, 379(6560), 31. doi:10.1038/379031a0

Balsdon, T., Summersby, S., Kemp, R. & White, D. (2018). Improving face identification with specialist teams. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 3(1), 25. doi:10.1186/s41235-018-0114-7

Balsdon, T., Summersby, S., Kemp, R. & White, D. (2018). Improving face identification with specialist teams. Cognitive research: principles and implications, 3, 25. doi:10.1186/s41235-018-0114-7

J. Bayne, T. & Pacherie, E. (2005). In Defence of the Doxastic Conception of Delusions. Mind and Language , 20(2), 163–88

Chambon, V., Thero, H., Vidal, M., Vandendriessche, H., Haggard, P. & Palminteri, S. (2020). Information about action outcomes differentially affects learning from self-determined versus imposed choices. Nature Human Behaviour , 4, 1067-1079. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0919-5

Castro, V. (2019). Inner Speech and Metacognition: a commitment-based approach. Logos & Episteme, X(3), 245-261. doi:10.5840/logos-episteme201910324

Castro, V. (2019). Inner Speech and Metacognition: a defense of the commitment-based approach. Logos and Episteme: An International Journal of Epistemology, 3, 245-261. doi:10.5840/logos-episteme201910324

Sidarus, N., Vuorre, M. & Haggard, P. (2017). Integrating prospective and retrospective cues to the sense of agency: a multi-study investigation. Neuroscience of Consciousness, 2017(1). doi:10.1093/nc/nix012

Khamassi, M., Girard, B., Clodic, A., Devin, S., Renaudo, E., Pacherie, E., Alami, R. & Chatila, R. (2016). Integration of Action, Joint Action and Learning in Robot Cognitive Architectures. Intellectica, 65, 65: 169-203

Pacherie, E. (2002). Intention .

Pacherie, E. (2013). Intentional joint agency: shared intention lite. Synthese, 190(10), 1817-1839. doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0263-7

Mylopoulos, M. & Pacherie, E. (2017). Intentions and Motor Representations: The Interface Challenge. Review of Philosophy and Psychology , 8(2), 317–336

Ponsot, E. & Neri, P. (2020). Inter-individual differences in spectrotemporal modulation processing despite similar audiograms : could they be used to assess supra-threshold hearing distortions? In e-Forum Acusticum 2020. doi:10.48465/fa.2020.0808

Weiss, A., Chambon, V., Drugowitsch, J. & Wyart, V. (2021). Interacting with volatile environments stabilizes hidden-state inference and its brain signatures. Nature Communications, 12, 2228. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22396-6

Nioche, A., Garcia, B., Boraud, T., Bourgeois-Gironde, S. & Rougier, N. (2019). Interaction effects between consumer information and firms' decision rules in a duopoly: how cognitive features can impact market dynamics. Palgrave Communications, 5(1). doi:10.1057/s41599-019-0241-x

Paraouty, N., Ewert, S., Wallaert, N. & Lorenzi, C. (2016). Interactions between amplitude modulation and frequency modulation processing: Effects of age and hearing loss. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(1), 121. doi:10.1121/1.4955078

Munuera, J., Ribes Agost, M., Bendetowicz, D., Kerebel, A., Chambon, V. & Lau, B. (2023). Intrinsic motivation for choice varies with individual risk attitudes and the controllability of the environment. PLoS computational biology, 19(8), e1010551. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010551

Billot, A., Bourgeois-Gironde, S. & Corcos, A. (2012). Introduction : Neuroeconomics of Learning and Decision. Recherches Economiques de Louvain - Louvain economic review, 78. doi:10.3917/rel.783.0005

Sidarus, N., Vuorre, M., Metcalfe, J. & Haggard, P. (2017). Investigating the Prospective Sense of Agency: Effects of Processing Fluency, Stimulus Ambiguity, and Response Conflict. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 545. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00545

Hansmann-Roth, S. & Mamassian, P. (2019). Investigating the Role of Object Features in Material Perception Using MLDS and MLCM. Perception, 48, 10-10

Pacherie, E. (2007). Is collective intentionality really primitive? (pp. 153-175).