Publications

Bavard, S. & Palminteri, S. (2021). Why unchosen options linger in our minds. Communications Biology , 4, 1271. doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02803-w

Lou, C., Duan, X., Altarelli, I., Sweeney, J., Ramus, F. & Zhao, J. (2019). White matter network connectivity deficits in developmental dyslexia. Human brain mapping, 40(2), 505-516. doi:10.1002/hbm.24390

Zhao, J., Song, Z., Zhao, Y., Thiebaut De Schotten, M., Altarelli, I. & Ramus, F. (2022). White matter connectivity in uncinate fasciculus accounts for visual attention span in developmental dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 177, 108414. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108414

Recht, S. , Mamassian, P. & de Gardelle, V. (2018). When temporal attention lacks confidence. bioRxiv, 496232

Lebreton, M. & Palminteri, S. (2016). When are inter-individual brain-behavior correlations informative? bioRxiv. doi:10.1101/036772

Jovanovic, L. & Mamassian, P. (2019). When an Event Is Perceived Depends on Where We Attend. I-Perception, 10(3), 2041669519858096. doi:10.1177/2041669519858096

Jovanovic, L. & Mamassian, P. (2018). When a visual event is perceived depends on where it is presented. Journal of Vision, 18(10), 714-714. doi:10.1167/18.10.714

Jovanovic, L. & Mamassian, P. (2019). When a Visual Event Is Perceived Depends on How We Attend to Its Temporal Context. Perception, 48, 146

Ramus, F. (2013). What's the point of neuropsychoanalysis? The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 203(3), 170-1. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.113.127217

Ramus, F. & Szenkovits, G. (2008). What phonological deficit? Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006), 61(1), 129-41. doi:10.1080/17470210701508822

Schlenker, P. (2022). What It All Means. The MIT Press

Schlenker, P. (2019). What is Super Semantics? Philosophical perspectives, 32, 365-453. doi:10.1111/phpe.12122

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E. & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). What Do Monkey Calls Mean? Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(12), 894-904. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.004

Branchini, C., Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C., Donati, C. & Geraci, C. (2015). WH-duplication in Italian Sign Language (LIS) , 39–70John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/bct.71.03bra

Su, M., De Schotten, T. , Zhao, J., Song, S., Zhou, W. , Gong, G. , McBride, C., Ramus, F. & Shu, H. (2018). Vocabulary growth rate from preschool to school-age years is reflected in the connectivity of the arcuate fasciculus in 14-year-old children. Developmental science, 21(5), e12647. doi:10.1111/desc.12647

Liu, S. , Wei, W. , Chen, Y. , Peyre, H. & Zhao, J. (2021). Visual–Spatial Ability Predicts Academic Achievement Through Arithmetic and Reading Abilities. Front. Psychol. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.591308

Balsdon, T. & Clifford, C. (2018). Visual processing: conscious until proven otherwise. Royal Society open science, 5(1), 171783. doi:10.1098/rsos.171783

Balsdon, T. & Clifford, C. (2018). Visual processing: conscious until proven otherwise. , 5(1). doi:10.1098/rsos.171783

Strickland, B. & J. Scholl, B. (2015). Visual Perception Involves Event-Type Representations: The Case of Containment Versus Occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 570–580. doi:10.1037/a0037750

Ota, K. , Wu, Q. & Mamassian, P. (2020). Visual cue estimation with non-gaussian distribution. Journal of vision, 20(11). doi:10.1167/jov.20.11.1436

Lunghi, C., Galli-Resta, L., Binda, P., Cicchini, G., Placidi, G., Falsini, B. & Morrone, M. (2019). Visual Cortical Plasticity in Retinitis Pigmentosa. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 60(7), 2753-2763. doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25750

Lunghi, C. (2020). Visual Cortex Rewiring in Retinitis Pigmentosa: Plasticity is Preserved. Neuroscience, 424, 203-204. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.10.053

Klever, L. , Mamassian, P. & Billino, J. (2019). Visual Confidence in Younger and Older Adults: What Drives Individual Differences in Metaperception? Perception

Mamassian, P. (2016). Visual Confidence. Annual Review of Vision Science, 2, 459-481. doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114630

Schlenker, P. (2018). Visible Meaning: Sign language and the foundations of semantics. Theoretical Linguistics, 44(3-4), 123-208. doi:10.1515/tl-2018-0012

Aristodemo, V. & Geraci, C. (2017). Visible degrees in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language {&} Linguistic Theory, -(on line). doi:10.1007/s11049-017-9389-5

Geraci, C., Bayley, R., Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C. & Donati, C. (2015). Variation in Italian Sign Language (LIS): The case of wh -signs. Linguistics, 53(1), 125–151. doi:10.1515/ling-2014-0031

Vacher, J. , Coen-Cagli, R. & Mamassian, P. (2022). Unifying Different Psychometric Methods : Theory and Experiment. Journal of Vision, 22, 3879. doi:10.1167/jov.22.14.3879

Ruys, E. & Spector, B. (2017). Unexpected Wide-Scope Phenomena. In Everaert, Martin and Henk C. Van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Companion to SyntaxWiley. doi:10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom089

Ramus, F. & Szenkovits, G. (2011). Understanding the nature of the phonological deficit. (pp. 153-169). doi:10.4324/9780203838006