Publications

Sundara, M., Ngon, C., Skoruppa, K., Feldman, N., Onario Glenda, M., Morgan, J. & Peperkamp, S. (2018). Young infants’ discrimination of subtle phonetic contrasts. Cognition, 178, 57-66. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.009

Dautriche, I., Mahowald, K., Gibson, E., Christophe, A. & Piantadosi, S. (2017). Words cluster phonetically beyond phonotactic regularities. Cognition, 163, 128-145. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.02.001

Dautriche, I., Chemla, E. & Christophe, A. (2016). Word Learning: Homophony and the Distribution of Learning Exemplars. Language Learning and Development, 12(3), 231-251. doi:10.1080/15475441.2015.1127163

Engelen, T., Buot, A., Grèzes, J. & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2023). Whose emotion is it? Perspective matters to understand brain-body interactions in emotions. NeuroImage, 268, 119867. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119867

Guevara-Rukoz, A., Lin, I., Morii, M., Minagawa, Y., Dupoux, E. & Peperkamp, S. (2017). Which epenthetic vowel? Phonetic categories versus acoustic detail in perceptual vowel epenthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(2), EL211-EL217. doi:10.1121/1.4998138

Dupoux, E., Parlato, E., Frota, S., Hirose, Y. & Peperkamp, S. (2011). Where do illusory vowels come from? Journal of Memory and Language, 64(3), 199-210. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.004

Ngon, C. & Peperkamp, S. (2016). What infants know about the unsaid: Phonological categorization in the absence of auditory input. Cognition, 152, 53-60. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.014

Dautriche, I. & Chemla, E. (2016 ). What Homophones Say about Words. PLOS ONE, 11(9), 1-2. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162176

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E. & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). What Do Monkey Calls Mean? Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(12), 894-904. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.004

Casati, R. & Tonello, F. (2018). Voto elettronico e partecipazione democratica. Web e società democratica (pp. 3-15). Turin: Accademia University Press

Chevallier, C. (2021). Vivre dans un environnement risqué : quels impacts pour la psychologie ? In Claudia Senik (Eds.), Sociétés en danger (Odile Jacob ed., pp. 197 à 208). Paris: La Découverte. doi:10.3917/dec.senik.2021.01.0197

Babineau, M., Legrand, C. & Shi, R. (2021). Variable forms in French-learning toddlers' lexical representations. . doi:10.1037/dev0001157

Dailey, M., Straboni, C. & Peperkamp, S. (2023). Using allophonic variation in L2 word recognition: French listeners’ processing of English vowel nasalization. Second Language Research. doi:10.1177/02676583231181472

Mehler, J., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Altmann, G., Dupoux, E., Christophe, A. & Pallier, C. (1993 ). Understanding compressed sentences - The role of rhythm and meaning. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 682, 272-282

Bernal, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Millotte, S. & Christophe, A. (2010). Two-year-olds compute syntactic structure on-line. Developmental science, 13(1), 69-76. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00865.x

Križ, M. & Chemla, E. (). Two Methods to Find Truth-Value Gaps and Their Application to the Projection Problem of Homogeneity. Natural Language Semantics, 23(3), 205–248

Pichon, S., De Gelder, B. & Grèzes, J. (2009). Two different faces of threat. Comparing the neural systems for recognizing fear and anger in dynamic body expressions. NeuroImage, 47(4), 1873-83. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.084

Chemla, E. & Singh, R. (2017). Training and timing local scalar enrichments under global pragmatic pressures. Journal of Semantics, 34(1), 107-126. doi:10.1093/jos/ffw006

Safra, L., Chevallier, C., Grèzes, J. & Baumard, N. (2020). Tracking historical changes in trustworthiness using machine learning analyses of facial cues in painting. Nature Communications, 11, 4728. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-18566-7

Skoruppa, K., Mani, N. & Peperkamp, S. (2013). Toddlers' processing of phonological alternations: early compensation for assimilation in English and French. Child development, 84(1), 313-30. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01845.x

de Carvalho, A., Dautriche, I., Fiévet, A. & Christophe, A. (2021). Toddlers exploit referential and syntactic cues to flexibly adapt their interpretation of novel verb meanings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 203(105017). doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2020.105017

Dautriche, I., Cristia, A., Brusini, P., Yuan, S., Fisher, C. & Christophe, A. (2014). Toddlers default to canonical surface-to-meaning mapping when learning verbs. Child Development, 85(3), 1168-1180. doi:10.1111/cdev.12164

Jones, B. , DeBruine, L. , .., .., Chevallier, C. & (Et Al), . (2021). To which world regions does the valence–dominance model of social perception apply? Nat Hum Behav, 5, 159-169. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.7611443.v1

Collins, T. & Jacquet, P. (2018). TMS over posterior parietal cortex disrupts trans-saccadic visual stability. Brain stimulation, 11(2), 390-399. doi:10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.019

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Cäsar, C., Zuberbühler, K. & Ryder, R. (2017). Titi semantics: Context and meaning in Titi monkey call sequences. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 35(1), 271-298. doi:10.1007/s11049-016-9337-9

Cavanagh, P., Casati, R. & Elder , J. (2018). Tight shadows shrink depth. Journal of Vision, 18, 493. doi:10.1167/18.10.493

Havron, N., de Carvalho, A., Fiévet, A. & Christophe, A. (2019). Three- to Four-Year-Old Children Rapidly Adapt Their Predictions and Use Them to Learn Novel Word Meanings. Child development, 90(1), 82-90. doi:10.1111/cdev.13113

Pichon, S., De Gelder, B. & Grèzes, J. (2012). Threat prompts defensive brain responses independently of attentional control. Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991), 22(2), 274-85. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhr060

O'Madagain, C. (2020). This is a Paper about Demonstratives. Philosophia. doi:10.1007/s11406-020-00230-5

Havron, N., de Carvalho, A., Babineau, M., Barbir, M., Dautriche, I. & Christophe, A. (2023). There might be more to syntactic bootstrapping than being pragmatic: A look at grammatical person and prosody in naturalistic child-directed speech. Journal of child language, 1-5. doi:10.1017/S0305000923000181