Publications

Holgado, M. & Castro, V. (2020). The Social Cover View: a Non-epistemic Approach to Mindreading. Philosophia, 48, 483–505. doi:10.1007/s11406-019-00096-2

Pacherie, E. (2007). The Sense of Control and the Sense of Agency. PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness, 13, 1–30

Grynszpan, O. , Sahai, A., Hamidi, N. , Pacherie, E., Berberian, B. , Roche, L. & Saint-Bauzel, L. (2019). The sense of agency in human-human vs human-robot joint action. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 102820. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2019.102820

Schlenker, P. (2016). The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface. In Aloni, Maria and Dekker, Paul (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics (pp. 664-727). doi:10.1017/CBO9781139236157.023

Dokic, J. (2018). The Role of Noetic Feelings in Sensory Substitution. In F. Macpherson (Eds.), Sensory Substitution and Augmentation, Proceedings of the British Academy Oxford University Press

Pacherie, E. (2002). The Role of Emotions in the Explanation of Action. European Review of Philosophy , 5, 53–92

Vantrepotte, Q., Chambon, V. & Berberian, B. (2023). The reliability of assistance systems modulates the sense of control and acceptability of human operators. Scientific reports, 13(1), 14410. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-41253-8

Bai, D. & Strickland, B. (2023). The Pulfrich solidity illusion: a surprising demonstration of the visual system’s tolerance of solidity violations. Psychon Bull Rev. doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02271-9

Schlenker, P. (2011). The Proviso Problem: A Note. Natural Language Semantics, 19(4), 395–422 . doi:10.1007/s11050-011-9072-z

Schlenker, P. (2014). The Property Paradox in (not so) Plain English. Approaches to Meaning. Composition, Values, and Interpretation (pp. 203-219).

Armary, P., Dokic, J. & Sander, E. (2018). The Problem of Context for Similarity: An Insight From Analogical Cognition . Philosophies, 3(4), 39. doi:10.3390/philosophies3040039

Pacherie, E. (2012). The Phenomenology of Joint Action: Self-Agency Vs. Joint-Agency . (pp. 343-389).

Dewey, J., Pacherie, E. & Knoblich, G. (2014). The phenomenology of controlling a moving object with another person. Cognition, 132(3), 383-97. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.002

Pacherie, E. (2008). The phenomenology of action: a conceptual framework. Cognition, 107(1), 179-217. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003

Kriegel, U. (2019). The Perception/Cognition Divide: One More Time, with Feeling. In C. Limbeck-Lilienau and F. Stadler (Eds.), he Philosophy of Perception and Observation Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter

Dezecache, G., Grèzes, J. & Dahl, C. (2017). The nature and distribution of affiliative behaviour during exposure to mild threat. Royal Society open science, 4(8), 170265. doi:10.1098/rsos.170265

Fernandez-Velasco, P. & Casati, R. (2020). The many faces of disorientation: a response to Daniel R. Montello. Spatial Cognition & Computation , 20(4), 314-327. doi:10.1080/13875868.2020.1772267

Checchetto, A., Geraci, C., Cecchetto, C. & Zucchi, S. (2018). The language instinct in extreme circumstances: The transition to tactile Italian Sign Language ( LISt ) by Deafblind signers. Glossa, 3(1)

E. Santos, P. , Cabalar, P. & Casati, R. (2019). The knowledge of knots: an interdisciplinary literature review. Spatial Cognition & Computation , 19(4), 334-358. doi:10.1080/13875868.2019.1667998

Fisher, M., Knobe, J., Strickland, B. & Keil, F. (2017). The Influence of Social Interaction on Intuitions of Objectivity and Subjectivity. Cognitive science, 41(4), 1119-1134. doi:10.1111/cogs.12380

Cohen, A. , Bourgeois-Gironde, S. & Pollack, Y. (2020). The impact of intrinsic and extrinsic features on delay discounting. Memory & Cognition, 49, 380-388. doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01088-4

de Vignemont, F. (2018). The first-person in pain. In Bain, D., Brady, M., Corns, J. (Eds.), Philosophy of Pain: Unpleasantness, Emotion, and DevianceRoutledge

Bourgeois-Gironde, S. & Ferreira, J. (2023). The expressive power of voting rules. Soc Choice Welf. doi:10.1007/s00355-023-01486-y

Kuhn, J. (2021). The dynamics of negative concord. Linguist and Philos. doi:10.1007/s10988-020-09318-3

Rahnev, D., Desender, K., Lee, A., Adler, W., Aguilar-Lleyda, D., Akdoğan, B., Arbuzova, P., Atlas, L., Balcı, F., Bang, J., Bègue, I., Birney, D., Brady, T., Calder-Travis, J., Chetverikov, A., Clark, T., Davranche, K., Denison, R., Dildine, T., Double, K., Duyan, Y., Faivre, N., Fallow, K., Filevich, E., Gajdos, T., Gallagher, R., de Gardelle, V., Gherman, S., Haddara, N., Hainguerlot, M., Hsu, T., Hu, X., Iturrate, I., Jaquiery, M., Kantner, J., Koculak, M., Konishi, M., Koß, C., Kvam, P., Kwok, S., Lebreton, M., Lempert, K., Ming Lo, C., Luo, L., Maniscalco, B., Martin, A., Massoni, S., Matthews, J., Mazancieux, A., Merfeld, D., O'Hora, D., Palser, E., Paulewicz, B., Pereira, M., Peters, C., Philiastides, M., Pfuhl, G., Prieto, F., Rausch, M., Recht, S. , Reyes, G., Rouault, M., Sackur, J., Sadeghi, S., Samaha, J., Seow, T., Shekhar, M., Sherman, M., Siedlecka, M., Skóra, Z., Song, C., Soto, D., Sun, S., Van Boxtel, J., Wang, S., Weidemann, C., Weindel, G., Wierzchoń, M., Xu, X., Ye, Q., Yeon, J., Zou, F. & Zylberberg, A. (2020). The Confidence Database. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 317–325. doi:10.1038/s41562-019-0813-1

Arcangeli, M. (2021). The conceptual nature of imaginative content. Synthese, 199(1-2), 3189-3205. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02930-7

Fernandez-Velasco, P., Perroy, B. & Casati, R. (2021). The collective disorientation of the COVID-19 crisis. Global Discourse: An interdisciplinary journal of current affairs, 11(3), 44&-462. doi:10.1332/204378921X16146158263164

Baptista, A., Cohen, D., Jacquet, P. & Chambon, V. (2021). The Cognitive, Ecological, and Developmental Origins of Self-Disturbance in Borderline Personality Disorder. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.707091

Marie, A. , Yesilaltay , S. & Strickland, B. (2020). The cognitive foundations of misinformation on science - What we know and what scientists can do about it. EMBO Rep , 21(4), e50205. doi:10.15252/embr.202050205

Fernandez-Velasco, P., Nijman , J. & Casati, R. (2023). The cognitive advantages of the notebook. Cognitive Semiotics, 16(1), 3-21. doi:10.1515/cogsem-2023-2003