Publications

Schlenker, P., Coye, C. , Steinert{-}threlkeld, S., Klinedinst, N. & Chemla, E. (2022). Beyond Anthropocentrism in Comparative Cognition: Recentering Animal Linguistics. Cognitive Science, 46(12), e13220 . doi:10.1111/cogs.13220

XIAO, H., Strickland, B. & Peperkamp, S. (2022). How fair is gender-fair language? Insights from gender ratio estimations in French. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, . doi:10.1177/0261927X221084643

Stojanovic, I., De Brabanter, P., Nicolas, D. & Villanueva, N. (2005). Deferential Utterances. In Casati, R. and Origgi, G. (Eds.), In Referring to Objects, Interdisciplines.org., 4-19.

Asic, T. & Corblin, F. (2014). Telic definties and their prepositions. French and Serbian. In Aguilar-Guevara, Ana, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts (Eds.), Weak Referentiality (pp. 183-212).Benjamins

Chemla, E. & Egré, P. (2021). From many-valued consequence to many-valued connectives. Synthese, 198, 5315-5352. doi:10.1007/s11229-019-02344-0

Chemla, E. & Egré, P. (2019). Suszko's problem: mixed consequence and compositionality. Review of Symbolic Logic, 12(4), 736-767. doi:10.1017/S1755020318000503

Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2010 ). Experimental Detection of Embedded Implicatures. In Aloni, Maria and Bastiaanse, Harald and de Jager, Tikitu and Schulz, Katrin (Eds.), In Logic, Language and Meaning: 17th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 53–62. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_6

Chemla, E. & Schlenker, P. (2012). Incremental Vs. Symmetric Accounts of Presupposition Projection: An Experimental Approach. Natural Language Semantics, 20(2), 177–226 . doi:10.1007/s11050-012-9080-7

Chemla, E., Egré, P. & Schlenker, P. (2015). Predicting Moral Judgments From Causal Judgments . Philosophical Psychology, 28(1), 21–48. doi:10.1080/09515089.2013.863145

Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2011). Experimental Evidence for Embedded Scalar Implicatures. Journal of Semantics, 28(3), 359-400. doi:10.1093/jos/ffq023

Corblin, F. & Nicolas, D. (2016). Déterminants et Inférences. Travaux de Linguistique, 72(1), 7-10. doi:10.3917/tl.072.0007

Corblin, F. & Vlachou, E. (2016). Une échelle de mesure pour la précision relative des quantifieurs . Travaux de linguistique , 72(1), 49-71. doi:10.3917/tl.072.0049

Corblin, F. & Asic, T. (2016). Une nouvelle approche de l'opposition ici/là et ovde/tu . Travaux de linguistique , 72(1), 29-48. doi:10.3917/tl.072.0029

Corblin, F. & Nicolas, D. (2016). Introduction. Travaux de Linguistique, 72(1), 7-10. doi:10.3917/tl.072.0007

De Brabanter, P., Nicolas, D., Stojanovic, I. & Villanueva Fernandez, N. (2007). Les usages déférentiels. In Bouvier, Alban and Conein, Bernard (Eds.), L'épistémologie sociale. Une théorie sociale de la connaissance (pp. 139-162).Editions de l'EHESS

Denic, M. & Chemla, E. (2020). Quantifier Spreading in Child Language as Distributive Inferences. Linguistic Inquiry, 51(1), 1-21. doi:10.1162/ling_a_00340

Dezecache, G., Bourgeois-Gironde, S., Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Bazin, C. & Maille, A. (2019). Orangutans’ Comprehension of Zoo Keepers’ Communicative Signals. Animals , 9(6), 300. doi:10.3390/ani9060300

Dieuleveut, A., Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2019 ). Distinctions between primary and secondary scalar implicatures. Journal of Memory and Language, 106, 150-171. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2019.02.008

Florio, S. & Nicolas, D. (2015). Plural logic and sensitivity to order. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93(3), 444-464. doi:10.1080/00048402.2014.963133

Giannakidou, A. & Mari, A. (2017). La dimension épistémique du futur : le rôle des adverbes. In Baranzini and de Saussures (Eds.), Le Futur dans les langues RomanesPeter Lang Ag

Giavazzi, M., Daland, R., Palminteri, S., Peperkamp, S., Brugières, P., Jacquemot, C., Schramm, C., Cleret de Langavant, L. & Bachoud-Levi, A. (2018 ). The role of the striatum in linguistic selection: Evidence from Huntington’s disease and computational modeling. Cortex, 109, 189-204. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.031

Justo, D., Dutant, J., Hardy-Vallée, B., Nicolas, D. & Sylvand, B. (2003). Delegation, subdivision, and modularity: How rich is Conceptual Structure? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(6), 683-684. doi:10.1017/S0140525X03390156

Maldonado, M., Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2019). Revealing abstract semantic mechanisms through priming: The distributive/collective contrast. Cognition, 182, 171-176. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.009

Maldonado, M., Spector, B. & Chemla, E. (2017). Priming methods in semantics and pragmatics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40. doi:10.1017/S0140525X17000516

Maldonado, M., Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2017). Priming plural ambiguities. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 89-101. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2017.02.002

Mari, A. (2018). The French Future : evidentiality and information increase. Evidence for Evidentiality (pp. 199-226). Dordrecht: Benjamins

Mari, A. (2018). The French Future : evidentiality and information increase. Evidence for Evidentiality (pp. 199-226). Dordrecht: Benjamins

Mari, A. (2014). Each Other, Asymmetry and Reasonable Futures. Journal of Semantics, 31 (2), 209-261

Mari, A. & Retoré, C. (2016). Conditions d’assertion de "chaque" et de "tout" et règles de déduction du quantificateur universel. Travaux de Linguistique , 72, 89-106. doi:10.3917/tl.072.0089

Mari, A. (2016). Actuality entailments: when the modality is in the presupposition. In Amblard M., de Groote P., Pogodalla S., Retoré C. (Eds.), Vol. 10054: In Logical Aspects of Computational Linguistics. Celebrating 20 Years of LACL (1996–2016), Dordrecht: Springer Verlag, 191-210. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-53826-5_12