Publications

Ramus, F., Peperkamp, S., Christophe, A., Jacquemot, C., Kouider, S. & Dupoux, E. (2010). A Psycholinguistic Perspective on the Acquisition of Phonology. In C. Fougeron (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology (Vol. 10 ).De Gruyter Mouton

Peperkamp, S. & Dupoux, E. (2002). A typological study of stress "deafness" In Gussenhoven, C. and Warner, N. (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology VII (pp. 203-240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Nicolas, D. (2006). Ambiguïté. Sémanticlopédie: dictionnaire de sémantique

Darcy, I., Peperkamp, S. & Dupoux, E. (2007 ). Bilinguals play by the rules. Perceptual compensation for assimilation in late L2-learners. In Cole, J. and Hualde, J. (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 9 (pp. 411-442). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Nicolas, D. (2006). Compositionalité: questions philosophiques. Sémanticlopédie: dictionnaire de sémantique

Peperkamp, S. & Dupoux, E. (2002). Coping with phonological variation in early lexical acquisition. In I. Lasser (Eds.), The Process of Language Acquisition (pp. 359-385). Frankfurt: Peter Lang

Caze, R., Humphries, M. & Gutkin, B. (2013). Dendrites enhance both single neuron and network computation. In Remme et al (eds) (Eds.), Dendritic ComputationSpringer

Kuznetsov, A. & Gutkin, B. (2015). Dopaminergic cell Models. The Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience (pp. 2958-2965).

Dumont, G., Maex, R. & Gutkin, B. (2018). Dopaminergic Neurons in the Ventral Tegmental Area and Their Dysregulation in Nicotine Addiction. In Alan Anticevic and John D. Murray (Eds.), Computational Psychiatry: Mathematical Modeling of Mental Illness (pp. 47-84). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809825-7.00003-1

Graupner, M. & Gutkin, B. (2012). Dynamical Approaches to understanding cholinergic control of nicotine action pathways in the dopaminergic reward circuits. Computational Neuroscience of Drug Addiction (Springer ed.).Ahmed and Gutkin (eds.)

Nicolas, D. (2002). La catégorisation des noms communs : massifs et comptables. Catégorisation et Langage (pp. 29-51).

Giannakidou, A. & Mari, A. (2017). La dimension épistémique du futur : le rôle des adverbes. In Baranzini and de Saussures (Eds.), Le Futur dans les langues RomanesPeter Lang Ag

Lussange, J., Belianin, A., Bourgeois-Gironde, S. & Gutkin, B. (2021). Learning and Cognition in Financial Markets: A Paradigm Shift for Agent-Based Models. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (Vol. 1252, pp. 241-255). doi:10.1007/978-3-030-55190-2_19

Peperkamp, S. & Dupoux, E. (2007 ). Learning the mapping from surface to underlying representations in an artificial language. In Cole, J. and Hualde, J. (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 9 (pp. 315-338). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

De Brabanter, P., Nicolas, D., Stojanovic, I. & Villanueva Fernandez, N. (2007). Les usages déférentiels. In Bouvier, Alban and Conein, Bernard (Eds.), L'épistémologie sociale. Une théorie sociale de la connaissance (pp. 139-162).Editions de l'EHESS

Nicolas, D. (2006). Massif / comptable. Sémanticlopédie: dictionnaire de sémantique

Remme, M., Lengyel, M. & Gutkin, B. (2014). Phase Response Methods in Dendritic Dynamics. In Schultheiss et al (eds) (Eds.), Phase Response Cruves in NeuroscienceSpringer

Cremers, A. & Chemla, E. (2017). Probability Judgments of Gappy Sentences. In Pistoia-Reda, Salvatore and Filippo Domaneschi (Eds.), Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Approaches on Implicatures and Presuppositions (pp. 111-150).Palgrave

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E. & Zuberbühler, K. (2017). Semantics and Pragmatics of Monkey Communication. In Mark Aronoff (Eds.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of LinguisticsNew York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.220

Martin, A. & Peperkamp, S. (2011). Speech perception and phonology. In M. van Oostendorp, C. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (Eds.), Companion to Phonology. Volume IV. (pp. 2234-2256). Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley-Blackwell

Zuberbühler, K., Chemla, E. & Schlenker, P. (2021). Stereotyped vocalizations. Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science (pp. 7970-7974).Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3330-1

Asic, T. & Corblin, F. (2014). Telic definties and their prepositions. French and Serbian. In Aguilar-Guevara, Ana, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts (Eds.), Weak Referentiality (pp. 183-212).Benjamins

Mari, A. (2018). The French Future : evidentiality and information increase. Evidence for Evidentiality (pp. 199-226). Dordrecht: Benjamins

Mari, A. (2018). The French Future : evidentiality and information increase. Evidence for Evidentiality (pp. 199-226). Dordrecht: Benjamins

Nicolas, D. (2018). The logic of mass expressions. In E. N. Zalta (Eds.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab Center for the Study of Language and Information Stanford University

Gutkin, B. (2015). Theta-neurons. In Springer Verlag (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Comptutational Neuroscience (pp. 1034-1042).

Remme, M., Lengyel, M. & Gutkin, B. (2015). Trade-off between dendritic democracy and independence in neurons with intrinsic subthreshold membrane potential oscillatio. In Remme et al (eds) (Eds.), Dendritic ComputationSpringer

Nicolas, D. (2005). Types of degrees and types of event structures. Event arguments: foundations and applications (pp. 277-300).