Publications

Grèzes, J. & Dezecache, G. (2014). Bases cérébrales et cognitives de la communication émotionnelle. In M. Botbol (Eds.), L'empathie au carrefour des sciences et de la cliniqueJohn Libbey Eurotext

Maldonado, M., Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2019). Revealing abstract semantic mechanisms through priming: The distributive/collective contrast. Cognition, 182, 171-176. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.09.009

de Carvalho, A., Crimon, C., Barrault, A. , Trueswell, J. & Christophe, A. (2021). “Look! It is not a bamoule!” 18‐ and 24‐month‐olds can use negative sentences to constrain their interpretation of novel word meanings. Developmental Science, 24(1), e13085. doi:10.1111/desc.13085

Kolberg, L. , de Carvalho, A., Babineau, M., Havron, N., Fiévet, A., Abaurre, B. & Christophe, A. (2021). "The tiger is hitting! the duck too!" 3-year-olds can use prosodic information to constrain their interpretation of ellipsis. Cognition, 104626. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104626

Ngon, C., Martin, A., Dupoux, E., Cabrol, D., Dutat, M. & Peperkamp, S. (2013). (Non)words, (non)words, (non)words: evidence for a protolexicon during the first year of life. Developmental science, 16(1), 24-34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01189.x

Babineau, M., Shi, R. & Christophe, A. (2020). 14‐month‐olds exploit verbs’ syntactic contexts to build expectations about novel words. Infancy. doi:10.1111/infa.12354

Havron, N., Babineau, M. & Christophe, A. (2021). 18-month-olds fail to use recent experience to infer the syntactic category of novel words. Developmental Science, 24 (2), e1330. doi:10.1111/desc.13030

Carbajal, J., Peperkamp, S. & Tsuji, S. (2021). A meta-analysis of infants’ word-form recognition. Infancy, 26, 369-387. doi:10.1111/infa.12391

Kouider, S., Stahlhut, C., Gelskov, S., Barbosa, L., Dutat, M., de Gardelle, V., Christophe, A., Dehaene, S. & Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (2013). A neural marker of perceptual consciousness in infants. Science (New York, N.Y.), 340(6130), 376-80. doi:10.1126/science.1232509

Mascarenhas, S. (2021). A Note on the Cardinalities of Sets of Scalar Alternatives . Journal of Semantics, 38(3), 473–482. doi:10.1093/jos/ffab011

Fort, M., Brusini, P., Carbajal, J., Sun, Y. & Peperkamp, S. (2017). A novel form of perceptual attunement: Context-dependent perception of a native contrast in 14-month-old infants. Developmental cognitive neuroscience, 26, 45-51. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2017.04.006

Schlenker, P. (2010). A Phonological Condition that Targets Discontinuous Syntactic Units: ma/mon suppletion in French. Snippets(22), 11-13

Schlenker, P. (2002). A Plea for Monsters . Linguistics and Philosophy, 26(1), 29–120. doi:10.1023/A:1022225203544

Helming, K., Strickland, B. & Jacob, P. (2016). A pragmatic approach to the puzzle about early belief ascription. Mind & Language, 31(4), 438-469

Ramus, F., Peperkamp, S., Christophe, A., Jacquemot, C., Kouider, S. & Dupoux, E. (2010). A Psycholinguistic Perspective on the Acquisition of Phonology. In C. Fougeron (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology (Vol. 10 ).De Gruyter Mouton

Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S. & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress "deafness" Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110(3), 1606-1618

Abrusan, M. & Spector, B. (2011). A Semantics for Degree Questions Based on Intervals: Negative Islands and Their Obviation. Journal of Semantics, 28(1), 107-147. doi:10.1093/jos/ffq013

Schlenker, P. & Mathur G, G. (2013). A Strong Crossover Effect in ASL. Snippets. doi:10.7358/snip-2013-027-schl

Peperkamp, S. & Dupoux, E. (2002). A typological study of stress "deafness" In Gussenhoven, C. and Warner, N. (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology VII (pp. 203-240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Spector, B. & Egré, P. (2015). A Uniform Semantics for Embedded Interrogatives: An Answer, Not Necessarily the Answer. Synthese, 192(6), 1729–1784 . doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0722-4

Mantovan, L., Duarte, K., Geraci, C. & Cardinaletti, A. (2016). Access to Knowledge The Issue of Deaf Students and More. Annali di Ca' Foscari. Serie occidentale, 50, 149–164. doi:10.14277/2499-1562/AnnOc-50-16-7

Turnbull, R. & Peperkamp, S. (2019). Across-language priming in bilinguals: does English bet prime French bête? In S. Calhoun, P. Escudero, M. Tabain & P. Warren (Eds.), In Proceedings of the 19th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Canberra, Australia, Melbourne, Australia, 1367-1371.

Pacherie, E. (2012). Action. (pp. 92–111 ).

Sahai, A., Desantis, A., Grynszpan, O., Pacherie, E. & Berberian, B. (2019). Action co-representation and the sense of agency during a joint Simon task: comparing human and machine co-agents. Consciousness and Cognition, 67, 44-55. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.11.008

Skoruppa, K. & Peperkamp, S. (2011). Adaptation to novel accents: feature-based learning of context-sensitive phonological regularities. Cognitive science, 35(2), 348-66. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01152.x

Belhassein, K., Fernández-Castro, V., Mayima, A., Clodic, A., Pacherie, E., Guidetti, M., Alami, R. & Cochet, H. (2022). Addressing joint action challenges in HRI: Insights from psychology and philosophy. Acta Psychologica, 222, 103476. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103476

Arcangeli, M. & Dokic, J. (2018). Affective Memory: A Little Help From Our Imagination. In K. Michaelian, D. Debus, D. Perrin (Eds.), New Directions in the Philosophy of Memory, (pp. 139–157).Routledge,

Pacherie, E. (2001). Agency Lost and Found: A Commentary on Spence. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology, 8(2), 173–176

Jeannerod , M. & Pacherie, E. (2004). Agency, Simulation and Self-Identification. Mind and Language, 19(2), 113–146

Buehler, D. (2021). Agential capacities: a capacity to guide. Philosophical Studies , . doi:10.1007/s11098-021-01649-6