Publications

Bernard, M., Thiollière, R., Saksida, A., Loukatou, G., Larsen, E., Johnson, M., Fibla, L., Dupoux, E., Daland, R., Cao, X. & Cristia, A. (2020). WordSeg: Standardizing unsupervised word form segmentation from text. Behavior research methods, 52(1), 264-278. doi:10.3758/s13428-019-01223-3

Bavard, S. & Palminteri, S. (2021). Why unchosen options linger in our minds. Communications Biology , 4, 1271. doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02803-w

Engelen, T., Buot, A., Grèzes, J. & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2023). Whose emotion is it? Perspective matters to understand brain-body interactions in emotions. NeuroImage, 268, 119867. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119867

Guevara-Rukoz, A., Lin, I., Morii, M., Minagawa, Y., Dupoux, E. & Peperkamp, S. (2017). Which epenthetic vowel? Phonetic categories versus acoustic detail in perceptual vowel epenthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(2), EL211-EL217. doi:10.1121/1.4998138

Bachoud-Levi, A., Dupoux, E., Cohen, L. & Mehler, J. (1998). Where is the length effect? A cross-linguistic study of speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(3), 331-346

Dupoux, E., Parlato, E., Frota, S., Hirose, Y. & Peperkamp, S. (2011). Where do illusory vowels come from? Journal of Memory and Language, 64(3), 199-210. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.004

Recht, S. , Mamassian, P. & de Gardelle, V. (2018). When temporal attention lacks confidence. bioRxiv, 496232

Lebreton, M. & Palminteri, S. (2016). When are inter-individual brain-behavior correlations informative? bioRxiv. doi:10.1101/036772

Jovanovic, L. & Mamassian, P. (2019). When an Event Is Perceived Depends on Where We Attend. I-Perception, 10(3), 2041669519858096. doi:10.1177/2041669519858096

Jovanovic, L. & Mamassian, P. (2018). When a visual event is perceived depends on where it is presented. Journal of Vision, 18(10), 714-714. doi:10.1167/18.10.714

Jovanovic, L. & Mamassian, P. (2019). When a Visual Event Is Perceived Depends on How We Attend to Its Temporal Context. Perception, 48, 146

Schlenker, P. (2019). What is Super Semantics? Philosophical perspectives, 32, 365-453. doi:10.1111/phpe.12122

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E. & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). What Do Monkey Calls Mean? Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(12), 894-904. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.004

Branchini, C., Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C., Donati, C. & Geraci, C. (2015). WH-duplication in Italian Sign Language (LIS) , 39–70John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/bct.71.03bra

Balsdon, T. & Clifford, C. (2018). Visual processing: conscious until proven otherwise. Royal Society open science, 5(1), 171783. doi:10.1098/rsos.171783

Balsdon, T. & Clifford, C. (2018). Visual processing: conscious until proven otherwise. , 5(1). doi:10.1098/rsos.171783

Strickland, B. & J. Scholl, B. (2015). Visual Perception Involves Event-Type Representations: The Case of Containment Versus Occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 570–580. doi:10.1037/a0037750

Ota, K. , Wu, Q. & Mamassian, P. (2020). Visual cue estimation with non-gaussian distribution. Journal of vision, 20(11). doi:10.1167/jov.20.11.1436

Lunghi, C., Galli-Resta, L., Binda, P., Cicchini, G., Placidi, G., Falsini, B. & Morrone, M. (2019). Visual Cortical Plasticity in Retinitis Pigmentosa. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 60(7), 2753-2763. doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25750

Lunghi, C. (2020). Visual Cortex Rewiring in Retinitis Pigmentosa: Plasticity is Preserved. Neuroscience, 424, 203-204. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.10.053

Klever, L. , Mamassian, P. & Billino, J. (2019). Visual Confidence in Younger and Older Adults: What Drives Individual Differences in Metaperception? Perception

Mamassian, P. (2016). Visual Confidence. Annual Review of Vision Science, 2, 459-481. doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114630

Schlenker, P. (2018). Visible Meaning: Sign language and the foundations of semantics. Theoretical Linguistics, 44(3-4), 123-208. doi:10.1515/tl-2018-0012

Aristodemo, V. & Geraci, C. (2017). Visible degrees in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language {&} Linguistic Theory, -(on line). doi:10.1007/s11049-017-9389-5

Azzalini, D., Rebollo, I. & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2019). Visceral Signals Shape Brain Dynamics and Cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 23(6), 488-509. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.007

Cleret de Langavant, L., Trinkler, I., Remy, P., Thirioux, B., Mcintyre, J., Berthoz, A., Dupoux, E. & Bachoud-Levi, A. (2012). Viewing another person's body as a target object: a behavioural and PET study of pointing. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1801-13

Geraci, C., Bayley, R., Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C. & Donati, C. (2015). Variation in Italian Sign Language (LIS): The case of wh -signs. Linguistics, 53(1), 125–151. doi:10.1515/ling-2014-0031

Dupoux, E. & Jacob, P. (2007). Universal moral grammar: a critical appraisal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(9), 373-378

Vacher, J. , Coen-Cagli, R. & Mamassian, P. (2022). Unifying Different Psychometric Methods : Theory and Experiment. Journal of Vision, 22, 3879. doi:10.1167/jov.22.14.3879

Mehler, J., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Altmann, G., Dupoux, E., Christophe, A. & Pallier, C. (1993 ). Understanding compressed sentences - The role of rhythm and meaning. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 682, 272-282