Schlenker, P., Chemla, E. & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). What Do Monkey Calls Mean?Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(12), 894-904. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.004
International Journal article
Chambon, V., Domenech, P., Pacherie, E., Koechlin, E., Baraduc, P. & Farrer, C. (2011). What are they up to? The role of sensory evidence and prior knowledge in action understanding. PloS one, 6(2), e17133. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017133
Book chapter
Pacherie, E. & Haggard, P. (2010). What Are Intentions? . (pp. 70–84).
Pacherie, E. (2006). Towards a Dynamic Theory of Intentions . (pp. 145-167).
Book chapter
Butterfill , S. & Pacherie, E. (2020). Towards a blueprint for a social animal. In Fiebich, Anika (Eds.), Minimal Cooperation and Shared Agency (pp. 111-125).Springer . doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29783-1
International Journal article
Dokic, J. & Pacherie, E. (2007). Too much ado about beliefs. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(1-2), 185-200. doi:10.1007/s11097-006-9036-9
Ripley, D., Verheyen, S. & Egré, P. (2019). The Sorites Paradox in Psychology. In S. Oms and E. Zardini (Eds.), The Sorites Paradox (pp. 263-286). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Pacherie, E. (2012). The Phenomenology of Joint Action: Self-Agency Vs. Joint-Agency . (pp. 343-389).
International Journal article
Dewey, J., Pacherie, E. & Knoblich, G. (2014). The phenomenology of controlling a moving object with another person. Cognition, 132(3), 383-97. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.05.002
International Journal article
Pacherie, E. (2008). The phenomenology of action: a conceptual framework. Cognition, 107(1), 179-217. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003
Nicolas, D. (2018). The logic of mass expressions. In E. N. Zalta (Eds.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Stanford: The Metaphysics Research Lab Center for the Study of Language and Information Stanford University