Publications

Dumont, G. & Gutkin, B. (2019). Macroscopic phase resetting-curves determine oscillatory coherence and signal transfer in inter-coupled neural circuits. PLOS Computational Biology . doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007019

Dumont, G., Maex, R. & Gutkin, B. (2018). Dopaminergic Neurons in the Ventral Tegmental Area and Their Dysregulation in Nicotine Addiction. In Alan Anticevic and John D. Murray (Eds.), Computational Psychiatry: Mathematical Modeling of Mental Illness (pp. 47-84). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-809825-7.00003-1

Dumont, G. & Gutkin, B. (2018). Macroscopic phase resetting-curves determine oscillatory coherence and signal transfer in inter-coupled neural circuits. arXiv , 1812.03455

Dumont, G., Ermentrout, G. & Gutkin, B. (2017). Macroscopic phase-resetting curves for spiking neural networks. Physical review. E, 96, 042311. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.96.042311

Dumont, G., Payeur , A. & Longtin , A. (2017). A stochastic-field description of finite-size spiking neural networks. PLoS Comput Biol, 13(8), e1005691. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005691

Dubreuil, A., Valente, A., Mastrogiuseppe, F. & Ostojic, S. (2019). Disentangling the roles of dimensionality and cell classes in neural computation. In NeurIPS Workshop.

Dipoppa, M. & Gutkin, B. (2013). Flexible frequency control of cortical oscillations enables computations required for working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(31), 12828-12833. doi:10.1073/pnas.1303270110

Dipoppa, M. & Gutkin, B. (2013). Correlations in background activity control persistent state stability and allow execution of working memory tasks. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 7, 139. doi:10.3389/fncom.2013.00139

Dipoppa, M., Krupa, M., Torcini, A. & Gutkin, B. (2012). Marginally Stable States and Quasi-periodic minor attractors in excitable pulse-coupled networks. SIADS , 63(1), 62-97

Dipoppa, M., Szwed, M. & Gutkin, B. (2016). Controlling Working Memory Operations by Selective Gating: The Roles of Oscillations and Synchrony. Advances in cognitive psychology, 12(4), 209-232. doi:10.5709/acp-0199-x

Di Volo, M., Morozova, E., Lapish, C., Kuznetsov, A. & Gutkin, B. (2018). Dynamical ventral tegmental area circuit mechanisms of alcohol‐dependent dopamine release. European Journal of Neuroscience, Special issue article. doi:10.1111/ejn.14147

Deperrois, N. & Gutkin, B. (2018). Nicotinic and Cholinergic Modulation of Reward Prediction Error Computations in the Ventral Tegmental Area: a Minimal Circuit Model. bioRxiv, 423806. doi:10.1101/423806

Deperrois, N., Moiseeva, V. & Gutkin, B. (2019). Minimal Circuit Model of Reward Prediction Error Computations and Effects of Nicotinic Modulations. Frontiers in neural circuits, 12, 116. doi:10.3389/fncir.2018.00116

Delorme, C., Salvador, A., Valabrègue, R., Roze, E., Palminteri, S., Vidailhet, M., De Wit, S., Robbins, T., Hartmann, A. & Worbe, Y. (2015). Enhanced habit formation in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. Brain, 139(2), 605-615. doi:10.1093/brain/awv307

Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Dupoux, E. & Gout, A. (2000). Electrophysiological correlates of phonological processing: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 635-647

Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., Mehler, J., Cohen, L., Paulesu, E., Perani, D., van de Moortele, P., Lehericy, S. & Lebihan, D. (1997). Anatomical variability in the cortical representation of first and second language. Neuroreport, 8(17), 3809-3815

Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E. & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology-human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 626-641

Dehaene, S., Changeux, J., Naccache, L., Sackur, J. & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends in cognitive sciences, 10(5), 204-11. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007

Défossez, A., Zeghidour, N., Usunier, N., Bottou, L. & Bach, F. (2018). SING: Symbol-to-Instrument Neural Generator. In Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Dec 2018, Montréal, Canada.

de Seyssel, M. & Dupoux, E. (2020). Does bilingual input hurt? A simulation of language discrimination and clustering using i-vectors. In CogSci 2020-42nd Annual Virtual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.

de Gardelle, V., Sackur, J. & Kouider, S. (2009). Perceptual illusions in brief visual presentations. Consciousness and cognition, 18(3), 569-77. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.03.002

de Gardelle, V., Kouider, S. & Sackur, J. (2010). An oblique illusion modulated by visibility: non-monotonic sensory integration in orientation processing. Journal of vision, 10(10), 6. doi:10.1167/10.10.6

De Diego-Balaguer, R., Schramm, C., Rebeix, I., Dupoux, E., Durr, A., Brice, A., Charles, P., Cleret de Langavant, L., Youssov, K., Verny, C., Damotte, V., Azulay, J., Goizet, C., Simonin, C., Tranchant, C., Maison, P., Rialland, A., Schmitz, D., Jacquemot, C., Fontaine, B. & Bachoud-Levi, A. (2016 ). COMT Val158Met} Polymorphism Modulates Huntington's Disease Progression. Plos One, 11(9), e0161106. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161106

David, A., Mahiko, K., Sackur, J. & Vincent De, G. (2021). Confidence can be automatically integrated across two visual decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(2), 161-171. doi:10.1037/xhp0000884

Darcy, I., Peperkamp, S. & Dupoux, E. (2007 ). Bilinguals play by the rules. Perceptual compensation for assimilation in late L2-learners. In Cole, J. and Hualde, J. (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 9 (pp. 411-442). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Daphné, R., Viola, S., Sackur, J. & Claire, S. (2019). Retrospective auditory cues can improve detection of near-threshold visual targets. Scientific Reports, 9, 18966. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55261-0

Cristia, A., Dupoux, E., Gurven, M. & Stieglitz, J. (2019). Child-Directed Speech Is Infrequent in a Forager-Farmer Population: A Time Allocation Study. Child development, 90(3), 759-773. doi:10.1111/cdev.12974

Cristia, A., Dupoux, E., Ratner, N. & Soderstrom, M. (2019). Segmentability Differences Between Child-Directed and Adult-Directed Speech: A Systematic Test With an Ecologically Valid Corpus. Open mind : discoveries in cognitive science, 3, 13-22. doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00022

Cristia, A., Dupoux, E., Gurven, M. & Stieglitz, J. (2017). Child-directed speech is infrequent in a forager-farmer population: a time allocation study. Child Development, NC. doi:10.1111/cdev.12974

Cristia, A., Dupoux, E., Hakuna, Y., Lloyd-Fox, S., Schuetze, M., Kivits, J., Bergvelt, T., Van Gelder, M., Filippin, L., Charron, S. & Minagawa-Kawai, Y. (2013). An online database of infant functional Near InfraRed Spectroscopy studies: A community-augmented systematic review. PLoS One, 8(3), e58906. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058906