Publications

de Cheveigné, A. (2019). ZapLine: a simple and effective method to remove power line artifacts. NeuroImage, 207, 116356. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116356

de Cheveigné, A. (2023). Why is the perceptual octave stretched? An account based on mismatched time constants within the auditory brainstem. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 153(5), 2600. doi:10.1121/10.0017978

Boubenec, Y., Shulz, D. & Debrégeas, G. (2012). Whisker encoding of mechanical events during active tactile exploration. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 6:74, 1-16. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2012.00074

Claverie, L., Boubenec, Y., Debrégeas, G., Prevost, A. & Wandersman, E. (2017). Whisker Contact Detection of Rodents Based on Slow and Fast Mechanical Inputs. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 10, 251. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00251

Stojanovic, I. (2009). When Truth Gives Out, by Mark Richard . Disputatio, 27, 150-158

Cepollaro, B., Domaneschi, F. & Stojanovic, I. (2020). When is it ok to call someone a jerk? An experimental investigation of expressives. Synthese, . doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02633-z

Cousineau, M., Demany, L. & Pressnitzer, D. (2009). What makes a melody: The perceptual singularity of pitch sequences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(6), 3179-87. doi:10.1121/1.3257206

Lakretz, Y. , Dehaene, S. & King, J. (2020). What Limits Our Capacity to Process Nested Long-Range Dependencies in Sentence Comprehension? Entropy, 22(4), 446. doi:10.3390/e22040446

Schlenker, P. (2019). What is Super Semantics? Philosophical perspectives, 32, 365-453. doi:10.1111/phpe.12122

Cousineau, M., Carcagno, S., Demany, L. & Pressnitzer, D. (2014). What is a melody? On the relationship between pitch and brightness of timbre. Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 7, 127. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00127

Grinfeder, E., Lorenzi, C., Haupert, S. & Sueur, J. (2022). What Do We Mean by “Soundscape”? A Functional Description. Front. Ecol. Evol, 10, 894232. doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.894232

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E. & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). What Do Monkey Calls Mean? Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(12), 894-904. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.004

Cousineau, M., Demany, L., Meyer, B. & Pressnitzer, D. (2010). What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant. Hearing research, 269(1-2), 34-41. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2010.07.007

Agus, T., Paquette, S., Suied, C., Pressnitzer, D. & Belin, P. (2017). Voice selectivity in the temporal voice area despite matched low-level acoustic cues. Scientific reports, 7(1), 11526. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11684-1

Strickland, B. & J. Scholl, B. (2015). Visual Perception Involves Event-Type Representations: The Case of Containment Versus Occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 570–580. doi:10.1037/a0037750

Schlenker, P. (2018). Visible Meaning: Sign language and the foundations of semantics. Theoretical Linguistics, 44(3-4), 123-208. doi:10.1515/tl-2018-0012

Aristodemo, V. & Geraci, C. (2017). Visible degrees in Italian Sign Language. Natural Language {&} Linguistic Theory, -(on line). doi:10.1007/s11049-017-9389-5

Geraci, C., Bayley, R., Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C. & Donati, C. (2015). Variation in Italian Sign Language (LIS): The case of wh -signs. Linguistics, 53(1), 125–151. doi:10.1515/ling-2014-0031

Paraouty, N. & Lorenzi, C. (2017). Using individual differences to assess modulation-processing mechanisms and age effects. Hearing research, 344, 38-49. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2016.10.024

Recanati, F. (2022). Understanding Force Cancellation. Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy , . doi:10.1080/0020174X.2022.2075920

Verheyen, S. & Egré, P. (2018). Typicality and Graded Membership in Dimensional Adjectives. Cognitive Science, 42(7 ), 2250–2286

Pressnitzer, D. & Mcadams, S. (1999). Two phase effects in roughness perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 105(5), 2773-2782. doi:10.1121/1.426894

Demany, L., Pressnitzer, D. & Semal, C. (2009). Tuning properties of the auditory frequency-shift detectors. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126(3), 1342-8. doi:10.1121/1.3179675

Schlenker, P. (2021). Triggering Presuppositions. Glossa, 6(1), 35. doi:10.5334/gjgl.1352

Recanati, F. (2021). Transparent Coreference. Topoi, 40(1), 107–115. doi:10.1007/s11245-019-09674-1

Sidarus, N., Palminteri, S. & Chambon, V. (2018). Trading off the cost of conflict against expected rewards. Plos Computational Biology, 42809. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007326

Desbordes, T., King, J. & Dehaene, S. (2024). Tracking the neural codes for words and phrases during semantic composition, working-memory storage, and retrieval. Cell reports, 43(3), 113847. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.113847

Gwilliams, L., Marantz, A. , Poeppel, D. & King, J. (2023). Top-down information shapes lexical processing when listening to continuous speech. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience . doi:10.1080/23273798.2023.2171072

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Cäsar, C., Zuberbühler, K. & Ryder, R. (2017). Titi semantics: Context and meaning in Titi monkey call sequences. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 35(1), 271-298. doi:10.1007/s11049-016-9337-9

Berthet, M., Mesbahi, G. , Pajot, A. , Cäsar, C., Neumann, C. & Zuberbühler, K. (2019). Titi monkeys combine alarm calls to create probabilistic meaning. Science Advances, 5(5), eaav3991. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aav3991