Egré, P. (2017). Vague Judgment: A Probabilistic Account. Synthese, 194(10 ), 3837–3865. doi:10.1007/s11229-016-1092-2
Book chapter
Cobreros, P., Egré, P., Ripley, D. & Van Rooij, R. (2015). Vagueness, Truth and Permissive Consequence. Unifying the philosophy of truth (pp. 409–430).
International Journal article
Egré, P. (2015). Vagueness: Why Do We Believe in Tolerance? Journal of Philosophical Logic , 44(6), 663-679
International Journal article
Geraci, C., Bayley, R., Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C. & Donati, C. (2015). Variation in Italian Sign Language (LIS): The case of wh -signs. Linguistics, 53(1), 125–151. doi:10.1515/ling-2014-0031
Book chapter
de Vignemont, F. (2018). Varieties of bodily feelings. In Kriegel, Uriah (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of consciousness Oxford: Oxford University Press
General public article
Origgi, G. (2017). Verità e Democrazia. Post-verità e post-politica Micromega, 2. MicroMega
Book chapter
Jacob, P. & de Vignemont, F. (2017). Vicarious experiences: perception, mirroring or imagination? In Julian Kiverstein (Eds.), Routledge handbook of the social mind (pp. 498-514).
Dokic & Pascal Engel, J. (2018). Visual Awareness and Visual Appearances. A Dual View. In F. Dorsch & F. Macpherson (Eds.), Phenomenal Presence (pp. 181-198). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780199666416.003.0008
International Journal article
Strickland, B. & J. Scholl, B. (2015). Visual Perception Involves Event-Type Representations: The Case of Containment Versus Occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 570–580. doi:10.1037/a0037750
Book chapter
Casati, R. & Tonello, F. (2018). Voto elettronico e partecipazione democratica. Web e società democratica (pp. 3-15). Turin: Accademia University Press
de Vignemont, F. (2018). Was Descartes right after all? An affective background for bodily awareness. . In Tsakiris, Manos de Preester, Helena (Eds.), The Interoceptive Basis of the Mind: from homeostasis to awareness Oxford: Oxford University Press
Other
Branchini, C., Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C., Donati, C. & Geraci, C. (2015). WH-duplication in Italian Sign Language (LIS) , 39–70John Benjamins Publishing Company. doi:10.1075/bct.71.03bra
Book chapter
Pacherie, E. & Haggard, P. (2010). What Are Intentions? . (pp. 70–84).
International Journal article
Chambon, V., Domenech, P., Pacherie, E., Koechlin, E., Baraduc, P. & Farrer, C. (2011). What are they up to? The role of sensory evidence and prior knowledge in action understanding. PloS one, 6(2), e17133. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017133
International Journal article
Jacob, P. (2020). What Do False-Belief Tests Show?Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 11(1), 1–20 . doi:10.1007/s13164-019-00442-z
International Journal article
Schlenker, P., Chemla, E. & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). What Do Monkey Calls Mean?Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(12), 894-904. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.004
International Journal article
Baumard, N. & Chevallier, C. (2012). What Goes Around Comes Around: The Evolutionary Roots of the Belief in Immanent Justice .
International Journal article
de Vignemont, F. & Jacob, P. (2012). What Is It Like to Feel Another's Pain? Philosophy of Science, 79(2), 295–316
Other
Stojanovic, I. (2007). What Is Said as Lexical Meaning. Cadernos de Filosofia, 21, 7-42
International Journal article
Schlenker, P. (2019). What is Super Semantics?Philosophical perspectives, 32, 365-453. doi:10.1111/phpe.12122
Book chapter
de Vignemont, F. (2021). What is the body schema? In Yochai Ataria, Shogo Tanaka, and Shaun Gallagher (Eds.), Body Schema and Body Image: New Directions. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198851721.003.0001
National journal article
Casati, R. (1990). What is Wrong in Inverting Spectra? Teoria
Casati, R. (2002). What the Internet Tells Us about the Real Nature of the Book. In .
Book chapter
Stojanovic, I. (2003). What to Say on What Is Said. In Blackburn et al. (Eds.), Modeling and Using Context. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 2680. (pp. 300-313). Berlin: Springer-Verlag