Publications

Tieu, L., Pasternak , R., Schlenker, P. & Chemla, E. (2018). Co-speech gesture projection: Evidence from inferential judgments. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics , 3(1), 109. doi:10.5334/gjgl.580

Tieu, L., Pasternak , R., Schlenker, P. & Chemla, E. (2017). Co-speech gesture projection: Evidence from truth-value judgment and picture selection tasks. Glossa, 2, 102. doi:10.5334/gjgl.334

Bouvier, A. (2007). Collective Belief, Acceptance, and Commitment in Science . Iyyun, 56, 91

Commier, S. & Berthet, M. (2019). Commentary: Titi Semantics: Context and Meaning in Titi Monkey Call Sequences . Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 512. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00512

Grèzes, J. & Dezecache, G. (2012). Communication émotionnelle: mécanismes cognitifs et cérébraux. In P. Allain, G. Aubin & D. Le Gal (Eds.), Cognition Sociale et NeuropsychologieSolal

Spector, B. (2016). Comparing exhaustivity operators. Semantics and Pragmatics, 9(11). doi:10.3765/sp.9.11

Schlenker, P. (2012). Complement Set Anaphora and Structural Iconicity in ASL. Snippets(25), 15-17

Koren, V. & Denève, S. (2017). Computational Account of Spontaneous Activity as a Signature of Predictive Coding. PLoS computational biology, 13(1), e1005355. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005355

Koechlin, E. (2021). Computational models of adaptive behavior and prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology, 47, 58–71. doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01123-1

Gutkin, B. & Ahmed, S. (2012). Computational Neuroscience of Drug Addiction.

Schlenker, P. (2002). Conditionals as Definite Descriptions (A Referential Analysis) Journal of Language & Computation, 2(3), 417-462. doi:10.1007/s11168-004-0908-2

Proust, J. (2018). Consensus as an epistemic norm for group acceptance. In J. A. Carter, A. Clark, J. Kallestrup, S.O. Palermos, and D. Pritchard (Eds.), Extended Epistemology Oxford : Oxford University Press.

Schlenker, P. (2004). Context of Thought and Context of Utterance (A Note on Free Indirect Discourse and the Historical Present) Mind & Language, 19(3), 279-304. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2004.00259.x

Tran-Van-Minh, A., Caze, R., Abrahamsson, T., Cathala, L., Gutkin, B. & Digregorio, D. (2015). Contribution of sublinear and supralinear dendritic integration to neuronal computations. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 9, 67. doi:10.3389/fncel.2015.00067

Falck, A., Labouret, G., Izard, V., Wertz, A., Keil Frank, C. & Strickland, B. (2020). Core cognition in adult vision: A surprising discrepancy between the principles of object continuity and solidity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(12), 2250–2263. doi:10.1037/xge0000785

Dipoppa, M. & Gutkin, B. (2013). Correlations in background activity control persistent state stability and allow execution of working memory tasks. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 7, 139. doi:10.3389/fncom.2013.00139

Wu, J., Gao, M., Shen, J., Shi, W., Oster, A. & Gutkin, B. (2013). Cortical control of VTA function and influence on nicotine reward. Biochemical Pharmacology, 86(8), 1173-1180. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2013.07.013

Strickland, B. & Chemla, E. (2018). Cross-linguistic regularities and learner biases reflect "core" mechanics. PloS one, 13(1), e0184132. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0184132

Bouvier, A. (2002). Dans quelle mesure la théorie sociale de James Coleman est-elle trop parcimonieuse?

Caze, R., Humphries, M. & Gutkin, B. (2013). Dendrites enhance both single neuron and network computation. In Remme et al (eds) (Eds.), Dendritic ComputationSpringer

Kuhn, J. (2017). Dependent Indefinites: The View From Sign Language. Journal of Semantics , 34(3), 407–446. doi:10.1093/jos/ffx007

Geraci, C. & Quer, J. (2014). Determining argument structure in sign languages. , 45–60John Benjamins Publishing Company

Kim, S., Shahaeian, A. & Proust, J. (2018). Developmental diversity in mindreading and metacognition. In Proust, J. & Fortier, M (Eds.), Metacognitive Diversity (pp. 97-133).OUP

Schlenker, P., Chemla, E., Arnold, K., Lemasson, A., Ouattara, K., Keenan, S., Stephan, C., Ryder, R. & Zuberbühler, K. (2013). Dialectal variation in the meanings of Campbell’s monkey alarm calls. In XIXth International Congress of Linguists (ICL19)-Workshop" Language variation at the interface of psycholinguistics and sociolinguistics".

Kuhn, J. (2021). Discourse anaphora – theoretical and experimental perspectives. In Quer, Pfau, and Herrmann (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Theoretical and Experimental Sign Language Research (pp. 458-479).Routledge

Dieuleveut, A., Chemla, E. & Spector, B. (2019 ). Distinctions between primary and secondary scalar implicatures. Journal of Memory and Language, 106, 150-171. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2019.02.008

Spector, B. (2004). Distributivity and specific indefinites. In Sylvia Blaho, Luis Vicente and Mark de Vos (Eds.), In Proceedings of ConSOLE XII, Sylvia Blaho, Luis Vicente and Mark de Vos.

Schlenker, P. (2010). Donkey Anaphora in Sign Language I: E-Type vs. Dynamic Accounts. In Maria Aloni, Harald Bastiaanse, Tikitu de Jager, and Katrin Schulz (Eds.), In Logic, Language and Meaning: 17th Amsterdam Colloquium. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_41

Schlenker, P. (2015). Donkey Anaphora in Sign Language II: The Presuppositions of Pronouns. In P. Grosz, P. Patel-Grosz and I. Yanovich (Eds.), In NELS 40: Proceedings of the Semantics Workshop on Pronouns.

Schlenker, P. (2011). Donkey Anaphora: The View From Sign Language (ASL and LSF) Linguistics and Philosophy, 34(4), 341–395 . doi:10.1007/s10988-011-9098-1