Publications

Yesilaltay , S., De Araujo, E. & Mercier, H. (2022). “If this account is true, it is most enormously wonderful”: Interestingness-if-true and the sharing of true and false news. Digital Journalism, 10(3), 373-394. doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1941163

Ghambaryan, A., Gutkin, B., Klucharev, V. & Koechlin, E. (2021). Additively Combining Utilities and Beliefs: Research Gaps and Algorithmic Developments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, . doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.704728

de Gardelle, V., Kouider, S. & Sackur, J. (2010). An oblique illusion modulated by visibility: non-monotonic sensory integration in orientation processing. Journal of vision, 10(10), 6. doi:10.1167/10.10.6

Farrell, H. , Mercier, H. & Schwartzberg, M. (2022). Analytical Democratic Theory: A Microfoundational Approach. American Political Science Review. doi:10.1017/S0003055422000715

Martin, J., Sackur, J. & Dienes, Z. (2017). Attention or instruction: Do sustained attentional abilities really differ between high and low hypnotisable persons? Psychological research, 1. doi:10.1007/s00426-017-0850-1

Vandendriessche, C., Bastian, M., Peyre, H., Stordeur, C., Asquaviva, E., Bahadori, S., Delorme, R. & Sackur, J. (2017). Attentional Lapses in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Blank Rather Than Wandering Thoughts. Psychological Science, 28(10), 1375-1386. doi:10.1177/0956797617708234

Terrone, E. (2017). Be Like This. Norms, Examples, Documents and Indexicals from a Neo-Aristotelian Perspective. Law and Literature, 1-15. doi:10.1080/1535685X.2017.1379194

Mercier, H., Hacquin, A. & Claidière, N. (2021). Being Easy to Communicate Might Make Verdicts Based on Confessions More Legitimate. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 21(3-4), 203-225. doi:10.1163/15685373-12340104

Chambon, V., Thero, H., Findling, C. & Koechlin, E. (2018). Believing in one's power: a counterfactual heuristic for goal-directed control. bioRxiv, 498675. doi:10.1101/498675

Terrone, E. (2017). Blessed Are the Forgetful: Utilitarianism and Remarriage in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind. Film and Philosophy, 21, 74-89

Kuhn, J., Geraci, C., Schlenker, P. & Strickland, B. (2021). Boundaries in Space and Time: Iconic Biases Across Modalities . Cognition, 210, 104596. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104596

Kriegel, U. (2018). Brentano’s Dual-Framing Theory of Consciousness. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 97(1), 79-98. doi:10.1111/phpr.12327

Kriegel, U. (2017). Brentano’s Evaluative-Attitudinal Account of Will and Emotion. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger , 142(4), 529-558

Stojanovic, I. (2014). Brevity. Journal of Linguistics, 50(3), 743-4

Sackur, J. (2018). Can hypnosis displace the threshold for visual consciousness? Neuroscience of consciousness, 4(1). doi:10.1093/nc/niy009

Kominsky, J. , Baker, L. , Keil Frank, C. & Strickland, B. (2021). Causality and continuity close the gaps in event representations. Memory and Cognition, 49, 518-531. doi:10.3758/s13421-020-01102-9

Chambon, V., Thero, H., Vidal, M., Vandendriessche, C., Haggard, P. & Palminteri, S. (2020). Choosing and learning: outcome valence differentially affects learning from free versus forced choices. Nature Human Behaviour, .

Dokic, J. (2018). Comments on “Postures of listening” by Victor A. Stoichita and Bernd Brabec de Mori. Terrain. Anthropologie et sciences humaines

Vuillaume , L., Martin, J., Sackur, J. & Cleeremans, A. (2020). Comparing self- and hetero-metacognition in the absence of verbal communication. Plos One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231530

Laurène, V., Jean-Rémy, M., Sackur, J. & Axel, C. (2019). Comparing self- and hetero-metacognition in the absence of verbal communication. Plos One, 15(4), e0231530. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231530

Koechlin, E. (2021). Computational models of adaptive behavior and prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology, 47, 58–71. doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01123-1

Egré, P. & O’{}madagain, C. (2019). Concept Utility. Journal of Philosophy, 116(10), 525–554. doi:10.5840/jphil20191161034

David, A., Mahiko, K., Sackur, J. & Vincent De, G. (2021). Confidence can be automatically integrated across two visual decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 47(2), 161-171. doi:10.1037/xhp0000884

Giustina, A. (2017). Conscious Unity From the Top Down: A Brentanian Approach. The Monist, 100(1 ), 16–37

Dehaene, S., Changeux, J., Naccache, L., Sackur, J. & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends in cognitive sciences, 10(5), 204-11. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.03.007

Rahnev, D., Balsdon, T., Charles, L., de Gardelle, V., Denison, R., Desender, K., Faivre, N., Filevich, E., Fleming, S., Jehee, J., Lau, H., Lee, A., Locke, S., Mamassian, P., Odegaard, B., Peters, M., Reyes, G., Rouault, M., Sackur, J., Samaha, J., Sergent, C., Sherman, M., Siedlecka, M., Soto, D., Vlassova, A. & Zylberberg, A. (2022). Consensus goals for the field of visual metacognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, . doi:10.1177/17456916221075615

Stojanovic, I. (2017). Context and Disagreement. Cadernos de Estudos Linguisticos, 59, 7-22. doi:10.20396/cel.v59i1.8648515

Stojanovic, I. (2010). Context, Meaning and Logical Truth. Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research. Special Issue on Logic and Philosophy Today, 2(27), 13-26

Recanati, F. (2017). Contextualism and Polysemy. Dialectica, 71(3), 379–397. doi:10.1111/1746-8361.12179

Recanati, F. (2017). Contextualism and Polysemy . Dialectica, 71(3), 379–397