Sundara, M., Ngon, C., Skoruppa, K., Feldman, N., Onario Glenda, M., Morgan, J. & Peperkamp, S. (2018). Young infants’ discrimination of subtle phonetic contrasts. Cognition, 178, 57-66. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.05.009
Guevara-Rukoz, A., Lin, I., Morii, M., Minagawa, Y., Dupoux, E. & Peperkamp, S. (2017). Which epenthetic vowel? Phonetic categories versus acoustic detail in perceptual vowel epenthesis. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142(2), EL211-EL217. doi:10.1121/1.4998138
International Journal article
Dupoux, E., Parlato, E., Frota, S., Hirose, Y. & Peperkamp, S. (2011). Where do illusory vowels come from?Journal of Memory and Language, 64(3), 199-210. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.12.004
International Journal article
Schlenker, P. (2019). What is Super Semantics?Philosophical perspectives, 32, 365-453. doi:10.1111/phpe.12122
Schlenker, P., Chemla, E. & Zuberbühler, K. (2016). What Do Monkey Calls Mean?Trends in cognitive sciences, 20(12), 894-904. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.10.004
International Journal article
Chambon, V., Domenech, P., Pacherie, E., Koechlin, E., Baraduc, P. & Farrer, C. (2011). What are they up to? The role of sensory evidence and prior knowledge in action understanding. PloS one, 6(2), e17133. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017133
Book chapter
Pacherie, E. & Haggard, P. (2010). What Are Intentions? . (pp. 70–84).
Strickland, B. & J. Scholl, B. (2015). Visual Perception Involves Event-Type Representations: The Case of Containment Versus Occlusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 570–580. doi:10.1037/a0037750
Book chapter
Dokic & Pascal Engel, J. (2018). Visual Awareness and Visual Appearances. A Dual View. In F. Dorsch & F. Macpherson (Eds.), Phenomenal Presence (pp. 181-198). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780199666416.003.0008
Geraci, C., Bayley, R., Cardinaletti, A., Cecchetto, C. & Donati, C. (2015). Variation in Italian Sign Language (LIS): The case of wh -signs. Linguistics, 53(1), 125–151. doi:10.1515/ling-2014-0031
Ruys, E. & Spector, B. (2017). Unexpected Wide-Scope Phenomena. In Everaert, Martin and Henk C. Van Riemsdijk (Eds.), The Companion to SyntaxWiley. doi:10.1002/9781118358733.wbsyncom089
Bernal, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Millotte, S. & Christophe, A. (2010). Two-year-olds compute syntactic structure on-line. Developmental science, 13(1), 69-76. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00865.x
International Journal article
Križ, M. & Chemla, E. (). Two Methods to Find Truth-Value Gaps and Their Application to the Projection Problem of Homogeneity. Natural Language Semantics, 23(3), 205–248
Pacherie, E. (2006). Towards a Dynamic Theory of Intentions . (pp. 145-167).
Book chapter
Butterfill , S. & Pacherie, E. (2020). Towards a blueprint for a social animal. In Fiebich, Anika (Eds.), Minimal Cooperation and Shared Agency (pp. 111-125).Springer . doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29783-1